Thread: shows casts, conversions and schemas in psql #2
Hi Bruce, This patch should be applied instead of the previous one. It is exactly like the old one except it adds: \dn list schemas Chris
Attachment
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> This patch should be applied instead of the previous one. It is exactly
> like the old one except it adds:
>
> \dn list schemas
>
> Chris
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Patch applied. initdb required. TODO item marked as done. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > This patch should be applied instead of the previous one. It is exactly > like the old one except it adds: > > \dn list schemas > > Chris [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Patch applied. initdb required. TODO item marked as done. Thanks.
I thought we were still discussing what to call the commands?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Patch applied. initdb required. TODO item marked as done. Thanks. > > I thought we were still discussing what to call the commands? I didn't see that, though I do remember you mentioning it. It was the naming of the backslash flags, right? I though we agreed on \dn for schemas, actually, and were discussing removing them all for longer names. Is that correct? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> > I thought we were still discussing what to call the commands? > > I didn't see that, though I do remember you mentioning it. It was the > naming of the backslash flags, right? I though we agreed on \dn for > schemas, actually, and were discussing removing them all for longer > names. Is that correct? I suggested that they be committed first and renamed later - it's easy to rename them than to keep tracking cvs... Chris