Thread: fmtId() and pg_dump
The attached patch implements the scheme outlined on -hackers a little while ago for reducing the usage of fmtId() in pg_dump. This is just a "proof of concept" -- I added a simple wrapper over appendPQExpBuffer() that takes an extra formatting sequence. The implementation is pretty trivial -- the assumption is made that (a) all printf-like formatting sequences consist of a '%' followed by a single character (b) any occurance of a '%' is a part of a formatting string I've converted a few of the places where fmtId() is used over to the new syntax. The reason I'm posting the patch is to get some feedback: is this a better method can just calling fmtId()? If so, I'll add some comments, convert all the code to use the wrapper as necessary, and think up a better name for the wrapper function. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
Attachment
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > The attached patch implements the scheme outlined on -hackers a little > while ago for reducing the usage of fmtId() in pg_dump. This is just > a "proof of concept" -- I added a simple wrapper over > appendPQExpBuffer() that takes an extra formatting sequence. The > implementation is pretty trivial -- the assumption is made that > > (a) all printf-like formatting sequences consist of a '%' followed > by a single character > > (b) any occurance of a '%' is a part of a formatting string > > I've converted a few of the places where fmtId() is used over to the new > syntax. The reason I'm posting the patch is to get some feedback: > is this a better method can just calling fmtId()? > > If so, I'll add some comments, convert all the code to use the wrapper > as necessary, and think up a better name for the wrapper function. > > Cheers, > > Neil > > -- > Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> > PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: I do not believe Neil intended this patch to be applied. >> The attached patch implements the scheme outlined on -hackers a little >> while ago for reducing the usage of fmtId() in pg_dump. This is just >> a "proof of concept" regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > I do not believe Neil intended this patch to be applied. > > >> The attached patch implements the scheme outlined on -hackers a little > >> while ago for reducing the usage of fmtId() in pg_dump. This is just > >> a "proof of concept" Yes, sorry. I knew someone liked the fmtId patch and I thought it was this one. I guess they just liked the _idea_ and a patch wasn't supplied. Patch removed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026