Thread: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations
Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which was even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have them dig through CVS). Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created, it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number of other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges, order of the creation among other things. Also made a note of the order of the header files in the POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line. -- Rod Taylor Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
Attachment
Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something else has to be going on... -- Rod Taylor This message represents the official view of the voices in my head ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations > Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which was > even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have > them dig through CVS). > > Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created, > it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number of > other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges, order > of the creation among other things. > > Also made a note of the order of the header files in the > POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line. > > > -- > Rod Taylor > > Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice > how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The > opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt > otherwise. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >
This one better describes the problem. heap.c needs to be updated to include 'Hard coded badness' for that table. -- Rod Taylor This message represents the official view of the voices in my head ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 PM Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations > Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something else > has to be going on... > > > -- > Rod Taylor > > This message represents the official view of the voices in my head > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> > To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM > Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations > > > > Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which > was > > even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have > > them dig through CVS). > > > > Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created, > > it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number > of > > other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges, > order > > of the creation among other things. > > > > Also made a note of the order of the header files in the > > POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line. > > > > > > -- > > Rod Taylor > > > > Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice > > how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The > > opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever > felt > > otherwise. > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---------- > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
Attachment
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rod Taylor wrote:
> This one better describes the problem.
>
> heap.c needs to be updated to include 'Hard coded badness' for that
> table.
> --
> Rod Taylor
>
> This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
> To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations
>
>
> > Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something
> else
> > has to be going on...
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rod Taylor
> >
> > This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>
> > To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
> > Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations
> >
> >
> > > Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which
> > was
> > > even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
> > > them dig through CVS).
> > >
> > > Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be
> created,
> > > it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the
> number
> > of
> > > other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,
> > order
> > > of the creation among other things.
> > >
> > > Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
> > > POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rod Taylor
> > >
> > > Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy.
> Notice
> > > how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
> > > opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever
> > felt
> > > otherwise.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > ----------
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Patch applied. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rod Taylor wrote: > This one better describes the problem. > > heap.c needs to be updated to include 'Hard coded badness' for that > table. > -- > Rod Taylor > > This message represents the official view of the voices in my head > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> > To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:38 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations > > > > Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something > else > > has to be going on... > > > > > > -- > > Rod Taylor > > > > This message represents the official view of the voices in my head > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> > > To: <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> > > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM > > Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations > > > > > > > Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which > > was > > > even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have > > > them dig through CVS). > > > > > > Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be > created, > > > it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the > number > > of > > > other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges, > > order > > > of the creation among other things. > > > > > > Also made a note of the order of the header files in the > > > POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Rod Taylor > > > > > > Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. > Notice > > > how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The > > > opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever > > felt > > > otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > ---------- > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026