Thread: [Fwd: Re: New EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement]
Hi all, I think we should include Martijn van Oosterhout's patch for his new EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement in our /contrib section, as it's really useful. How about it? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift
> Hi all, > > I think we should include Martijn van Oosterhout's patch for his new > EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement in our /contrib section, as it's really > useful. > > How about it? I haven't seen the patch submitted. Why wouldn't it be in the backend code? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes:
> I think we should include Martijn van Oosterhout's patch for his new
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement in our /contrib section, as it's really
> useful.
Putting a server patch in contrib seems sorta bizarre to me. We should
either accept the patch or not. AFAIR Martijn hasn't formally submitted
the patch yet, so this discussion is premature anyway.
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:15:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > > I think we should include Martijn van Oosterhout's patch for his new > > EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement in our /contrib section, as it's really > > useful. > > Putting a server patch in contrib seems sorta bizarre to me. We should > either accept the patch or not. AFAIR Martijn hasn't formally submitted > the patch yet, so this discussion is premature anyway. Very well. I'll tidy it up a bit and make sure it takes into account the last set of comments and submit it tomorrow. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that > actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over > the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.