Thread: NPGSQL/ODBC performance

I noticed working on VB.NET/PostgreSQL fast with ODBC as compared to NPGSQL.
Why?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NPGSQL-ODBC-performance-tf3293894.html#a9162233
Sent from the PostgreSQL - odbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi.

I do not understand it for the reasons why Npgsql has the connection pool.
The difference might certainly extend depending on how to unite the application.
Perhaps, I think that you have information and the numerical value of the
environment. Someone's answer might be able to be obtained by presenting it.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

----- Original Message -----
From: "RPK"

>
> I noticed working on VB.NET/PostgreSQL fast with ODBC as compared to NPGSQL.
> Why?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NPGSQL-ODBC-performance-tf3293894.html#a9162233
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - odbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster