Thread: Use Declare/Fetch and PG 7.4
Hi, When the ODBC´s "Use Declare/Fetch" option is enabled the automatic declaration of cursor great improve the performence for me. But testing this feature in PG 7.4, causes the following error: When the application makes a COMMIT, the cursors are automatically closed but the ODBC try to close this cursors defined inside transaction... In PG 7.3, this causes a WARNING only, but the behavior of this event is changed to ERROR in PG 7.4, aborting the application. Thank´s all Alexandre
Le Mon, Nov 10, 2003, à 04:30:42PM -0200, alexandre :: aldeia digital a écrit: > When the ODBC´s "Use Declare/Fetch" option is enabled the automatic > declaration of cursor great improve the performence for me. I second this observation with the workloads I'm confronted with. > In PG 7.3, this causes a WARNING only, but the behavior of this event is > changed to ERROR in PG 7.4, aborting the application. I'm not going to contribute much here, except express interest in seeing a solution to this (I didn't plan to move to 7.4 very quickly, but this would be a showstopper to me -- it's not a totally rare event for me to need datasets beyond what 32-bit Win32 will allow a single process to allocate, thus killing postgres.exe (ouch!)). -- Cyrille -- FRA: 61-18(FIJ) 51-29(JPN) 51-9(SCO) 41-14(USA) >> 43-21(IRL)
Hi, I will move to PG 7.4 quickly. I change the PG code from ERROR to WARNING to aviod this error, but I think that ODBC driver must correct this. Searching the mailing lists, I see a request from PG developer about the change CURSORs behavior, from WANRING to ERROR. Anyone report problemns and the code was changed... :( Alexandre > Le Mon, Nov 10, 2003, à 04:30:42PM -0200, alexandre :: aldeia digital a > écrit: > >> When the ODBC´s "Use Declare/Fetch" option is enabled the automatic >> declaration of cursor great improve the performence for me. > > I second this observation with the workloads I'm confronted with. > >> In PG 7.3, this causes a WARNING only, but the behavior of this event is >> changed to ERROR in PG 7.4, aborting the application. > > I'm not going to contribute much here, except express interest in seeing > a solution to this (I didn't plan to move to 7.4 very quickly, but this > would be a showstopper to me -- it's not a totally rare event for me to > need datasets beyond what 32-bit Win32 will allow a single process to > allocate, thus killing postgres.exe (ouch!)). > > -- Cyrille > > -- > FRA: 61-18(FIJ) 51-29(JPN) 51-9(SCO) 41-14(USA) >> 43-21(IRL) >