Thread: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Fabio Caiut
Date:

Hello,

I'm trying to understand the "SET application_name" command sent by the driver.

We have a database server with high concurrency, ~25K TPS, and looking the top queries (with pg_stat_statements view) I get it's the query taking more time.

The command is very fast but the number of calls is huge.


TOP 10 Queries (only ~2 hours collecting)


  calls   | total_time | avg_time |   rows   | avg_rows | hit_percent |                                                                                                                      
----------+------------+----------+----------+----------+-------------+------------------------------
 55782793 | 8212550.69 |     0.15 |        0 |     0.00 |             | SET application_name = ''
  4425751 |  322475.14 |     0.07 |   138606 |     0.00 |       98.98 | /* load one-to-many ...
  4097384 |  963780.17 |     0.24 |    84514 |     0.00 |       99.77 | /* load ...
  3908144 |  366598.92 |     0.09 |  3834578 |     0.00 |      100.00 | /* load ...
  2596097 |  480030.01 |     0.18 |  2596097 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* SELECT count(*) FROM ...
  2365353 |  290965.73 |     0.12 |  2365335 |     0.00 |       99.99 | /* load ...
  2081011 |  127373.91 |     0.06 |   379289 |     0.00 |       99.59 | /* load collection ...
  1303931 |  145544.50 |     0.11 |  1303925 |     0.00 |       95.94 | /* load ...
  1274982 |  577683.73 |     0.45 |  1274982 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* Select count(*) from ...
  1203475 | 1522327.87 |     1.26 |  4405775 |     3.00 |       89.44 | /* load ...


It takes ~8K seconds, more than 2 hours, it means that this command can use more than one core all the time! (if I'm understanding right)

I'm thinking as the application name is empty maybe this command could be avoid.
I have asked our Glassfish people to "unmark" this option if possible but they told me they don't know how to do it, where to do it.

I'm not sure if the quantity of calls is a problem in application, in glassfish or in driver. But, if it's possible tune to avoid it, I would like that.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Caiut

Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Vladimir Sitnikov
Date:
As far as I can tell, there is no option to completely disable "set
application_name" feature via property.

Is SQL appears when client calls
Connection#setClientInfo("ApplicationName", ...) or
Connection#setClientInfo(Properties).

It make sense to avoid setting the same application name again and
again for the same connection.
Can you please file an issue at https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues?

In the mean time, it would be good if you could capture thread dumps
from the application (e.g. 100 dumps with 10 second intervals under
typical load) and grep setClientInfo. That would point out the line in
code that issues that excessive setClientInfo.

Vladimir


Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Dave Cramer
Date:
SET application name should be ridiculously fast. What are the units ?



On 25 November 2015 at 10:20, Fabio Caiut <caiut@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

I'm trying to understand the "SET application_name" command sent by the driver.

We have a database server with high concurrency, ~25K TPS, and looking the top queries (with pg_stat_statements view) I get it's the query taking more time.

The command is very fast but the number of calls is huge.


TOP 10 Queries (only ~2 hours collecting)


  calls   | total_time | avg_time |   rows   | avg_rows | hit_percent |                                                                                                                      
----------+------------+----------+----------+----------+-------------+------------------------------
 55782793 | 8212550.69 |     0.15 |        0 |     0.00 |             | SET application_name = ''
  4425751 |  322475.14 |     0.07 |   138606 |     0.00 |       98.98 | /* load one-to-many ...
  4097384 |  963780.17 |     0.24 |    84514 |     0.00 |       99.77 | /* load ...
  3908144 |  366598.92 |     0.09 |  3834578 |     0.00 |      100.00 | /* load ...
  2596097 |  480030.01 |     0.18 |  2596097 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* SELECT count(*) FROM ...
  2365353 |  290965.73 |     0.12 |  2365335 |     0.00 |       99.99 | /* load ...
  2081011 |  127373.91 |     0.06 |   379289 |     0.00 |       99.59 | /* load collection ...
  1303931 |  145544.50 |     0.11 |  1303925 |     0.00 |       95.94 | /* load ...
  1274982 |  577683.73 |     0.45 |  1274982 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* Select count(*) from ...
  1203475 | 1522327.87 |     1.26 |  4405775 |     3.00 |       89.44 | /* load ...


It takes ~8K seconds, more than 2 hours, it means that this command can use more than one core all the time! (if I'm understanding right)

I'm thinking as the application name is empty maybe this command could be avoid.
I have asked our Glassfish people to "unmark" this option if possible but they told me they don't know how to do it, where to do it.

I'm not sure if the quantity of calls is a problem in application, in glassfish or in driver. But, if it's possible tune to avoid it, I would like that.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Caiut

Fwd: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Dave Cramer
Date:
+list


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Fabio Caiut <caiut@hotmail.com>
Date: 25 November 2015 at 12:18
Subject: RE: [JDBC] How to avoid SET application_name = ''
To: Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>


Hi Dave,

One call is really ridiculously fast. ( avg_time = 0.15 ms )

55782793 calls, in more or less 2 hours real time collecting, take 8212550.69 milisseconds

8212550.69 milisseconds
8212 seconds
136 minutes
2,2 hours

The problem is the number of calls.

We have already seen problems here of Glassfish + default Pool manager (I don't know which one) + pg jdbc resulting in absurd open connection rate in moments of high load.
I don't know if it is a related case.

I was just thinking that a simple solution (of my point of view, of course) could be 

 IF appname = null OR appname = '' DO NOTHING

It seems that is sent appname='' a lot of times: in open connection, in reset connection, in release connection, after a transaction, before a transaction ...
I'm not sure when, because in PostgreSQL we just log slow queries (more than 0,5s) ... so these commands don't appear in our common logs. 
We get it with pg_stat_statements extension.

Caiut


From: pg@fastcrypt.com
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:56:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [JDBC] How to avoid SET application_name = ''
To: caiut@hotmail.com
CC: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org


SET application name should be ridiculously fast. What are the units ?



On 25 November 2015 at 10:20, Fabio Caiut <caiut@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

I'm trying to understand the "SET application_name" command sent by the driver.

We have a database server with high concurrency, ~25K TPS, and looking the top queries (with pg_stat_statements view) I get it's the query taking more time.

The command is very fast but the number of calls is huge.


TOP 10 Queries (only ~2 hours collecting)


  calls   | total_time | avg_time |   rows   | avg_rows | hit_percent |                                                                                                                      
----------+------------+----------+----------+----------+-------------+------------------------------
 55782793 | 8212550.69 |     0.15 |        0 |     0.00 |             | SET application_name = ''
  4425751 |  322475.14 |     0.07 |   138606 |     0.00 |       98.98 | /* load one-to-many ...
  4097384 |  963780.17 |     0.24 |    84514 |     0.00 |       99.77 | /* load ...
  3908144 |  366598.92 |     0.09 |  3834578 |     0.00 |      100.00 | /* load ...
  2596097 |  480030.01 |     0.18 |  2596097 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* SELECT count(*) FROM ...
  2365353 |  290965.73 |     0.12 |  2365335 |     0.00 |       99.99 | /* load ...
  2081011 |  127373.91 |     0.06 |   379289 |     0.00 |       99.59 | /* load collection ...
  1303931 |  145544.50 |     0.11 |  1303925 |     0.00 |       95.94 | /* load ...
  1274982 |  577683.73 |     0.45 |  1274982 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* Select count(*) from ...
  1203475 | 1522327.87 |     1.26 |  4405775 |     3.00 |       89.44 | /* load ...


It takes ~8K seconds, more than 2 hours, it means that this command can use more than one core all the time! (if I'm understanding right)

I'm thinking as the application name is empty maybe this command could be avoid.
I have asked our Glassfish people to "unmark" this option if possible but they told me they don't know how to do it, where to do it.

I'm not sure if the quantity of calls is a problem in application, in glassfish or in driver. But, if it's possible tune to avoid it, I would like that.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Caiut


Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Fabio Caiut schrieb am 25.11.2015 um 16:20:
> I'm trying to understand the "SET application_name" command sent by the driver.
>
> We have a database server with high concurrency, ~25K TPS, and looking the top queries (with pg_stat_statements view)
>  I get it's the query taking more time.
>
> The command is very fast but the number of calls is huge.
>
>
> TOP 10 Queries (only ~2 hours collecting)
>
>
>    calls   | total_time | avg_time |   rows   | avg_rows | hit_percent |
> ----------+------------+----------+----------+----------+-------------+------------------------------
>   55782793 | 8212550.69 |     0.15 |        0 |     0.00 |             | SET application_name = ''
>    4425751 |  322475.14 |     0.07 |   138606 |     0.00 |       98.98 | /* load one-to-many ...
>    4097384 |  963780.17 |     0.24 |    84514 |     0.00 |       99.77 | /* load ...
>    3908144 |  366598.92 |     0.09 |  3834578 |     0.00 |      100.00 | /* load ...
>    2596097 |  480030.01 |     0.18 |  2596097 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* SELECT count(*) FROM ...
>    2365353 |  290965.73 |     0.12 |  2365335 |     0.00 |       99.99 | /* load ...
>    2081011 |  127373.91 |     0.06 |   379289 |     0.00 |       99.59 | /* load collection ...
>    1303931 |  145544.50 |     0.11 |  1303925 |     0.00 |       95.94 | /* load ...
>    1274982 |  577683.73 |     0.45 |  1274982 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* Select count(*) from ...
>    1203475 | 1522327.87 |     1.26 |  4405775 |     3.00 |       89.44 | /* load ...
>
>
> It takes ~8K seconds, more than 2 hours, it means that this command can use more than one core all the time! (if I'm
understandingright) 
>
> I'm thinking as the application name is empty maybe this command could be avoid.
> I have asked our Glassfish people to "unmark" this option if possible but they told me they don't know how to do it,
whereto do it. 
>
> I'm not sure if the quantity of calls is a problem in application, in glassfish or in driver.
>But, if it's possible tune to avoid it, I would like that.


Is it possible that this is configured as a "connection test" statement with your connection pool in Glassfish?
Including something like "test-on-borrow" (or test-on-return) so that this would send each time a
connection is taken out of the pool (or returned).

I don't think the driver sends this "on its own" without any trigger from the application.
The statement is sent if Connection.setClientInfo() is called, so maybe that called from somewhere in your application
orthe connection pool. 





FW: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Fabio Caiut
Date:
+list
(sorry)


From: caiut@hotmail.com
To: sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [JDBC] How to avoid SET application_name = ''
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:03:06 -0200

Hi Vladimir,

I have access just to postgres servers, I'll ask appserver guys to get thread dumps.

Thank you for help!

Caiut


> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:54:56 +0300
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] How to avoid SET application_name = ''
> From: sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com
> To: caiut@hotmail.com
> CC: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
>
> As far as I can tell, there is no option to completely disable "set
> application_name" feature via property.
>
> Is SQL appears when client calls
> Connection#setClientInfo("ApplicationName", ...) or
> Connection#setClientInfo(Properties).
>
> It make sense to avoid setting the same application name again and
> again for the same connection.
> Can you please file an issue at https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues?
>
> In the mean time, it would be good if you could capture thread dumps
> from the application (e.g. 100 dumps with 10 second intervals under
> typical load) and grep setClientInfo. That would point out the line in
> code that issues that excessive setClientInfo.
>
> Vladimir

Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Daniel Blanch Bataller
Date:
Hi everyone, this is my first post, so forgive me If I’m not respecting any protocol rule I haven’t read.

I’ve run a small test, the driver doesn’t do that by it’s own on every statement if it’s inside a pool and correctly configured, i’m using bdcp. See by yourself:

public DbcpExperiment() throws Exception {
initializePool();
}

protected void initializePool() {
basicDataSource = new BasicDataSource();
basicDataSource.setDriverClassName("org.postgresql.Driver");
basicDataSource.setUsername("test");
basicDataSource.setPassword("test");
basicDataSource.setUrl("jdbc:postgresql://127.0.0.1:5432/test?ApplicationName=DbcpExperiment");
basicDataSource.setInitialSize(1);
basicDataSource.setMaxIdle(1);  
basicDataSource.setMaxActive(1);
basicDataSource.setDefaultAutoCommit(false);
}

public void testApplicationName() throws Exception {


Connection connection = null;


for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
connection = basicDataSource.getConnection();
PreparedStatement preparedStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT 1");
preparedStatement.executeQuery();
connection.commit();
connection.close();
System.out.println(i);
}


}

test=# select calls, total_time, query FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY calls DESC;
 calls |    total_time    |                  query                  
-------+------------------+-----------------------------------------
  1000 | 4.85599999999995 | SELECT ?
  1000 |            0.446 | BEGIN
  1000 |            0.468 | COMMIT
     2 |            0.057 | SET application_name = 'DbcpExperiment'
     2 |            0.049 | SET extra_float_digits = 3
     1 |            0.232 | SELECT pg_stat_statements_reset();
(6 rows)

test=# 


Pom snippet:
==========

<dependencies>
<dependency>
    <groupId>commons-dbcp</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-dbcp</artifactId>
<version>1.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.postgresql</groupId>
<artifactId>postgresql</artifactId>
<version>9.4-1201-jdbc4</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>


Regards

- Daniel 



El 25 nov 2015, a las 19:25, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> escribió:

Fabio Caiut schrieb am 25.11.2015 um 16:20:
I'm trying to understand the "SET application_name" command sent by the driver.

We have a database server with high concurrency, ~25K TPS, and looking the top queries (with pg_stat_statements view)
I get it's the query taking more time.

The command is very fast but the number of calls is huge.


TOP 10 Queries (only ~2 hours collecting)


  calls   | total_time | avg_time |   rows   | avg_rows | hit_percent |
----------+------------+----------+----------+----------+-------------+------------------------------
 55782793 | 8212550.69 |     0.15 |        0 |     0.00 |             | SET application_name = ''
  4425751 |  322475.14 |     0.07 |   138606 |     0.00 |       98.98 | /* load one-to-many ...
  4097384 |  963780.17 |     0.24 |    84514 |     0.00 |       99.77 | /* load ...
  3908144 |  366598.92 |     0.09 |  3834578 |     0.00 |      100.00 | /* load ...
  2596097 |  480030.01 |     0.18 |  2596097 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* SELECT count(*) FROM ...
  2365353 |  290965.73 |     0.12 |  2365335 |     0.00 |       99.99 | /* load ...
  2081011 |  127373.91 |     0.06 |   379289 |     0.00 |       99.59 | /* load collection ...
  1303931 |  145544.50 |     0.11 |  1303925 |     0.00 |       95.94 | /* load ...
  1274982 |  577683.73 |     0.45 |  1274982 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* Select count(*) from ...
  1203475 | 1522327.87 |     1.26 |  4405775 |     3.00 |       89.44 | /* load ...


It takes ~8K seconds, more than 2 hours, it means that this command can use more than one core all the time! (if I'm understanding right)

I'm thinking as the application name is empty maybe this command could be avoid.
I have asked our Glassfish people to "unmark" this option if possible but they told me they don't know how to do it, where to do it.

I'm not sure if the quantity of calls is a problem in application, in glassfish or in driver.
But, if it's possible tune to avoid it, I would like that.


Is it possible that this is configured as a "connection test" statement with your connection pool in Glassfish?
Including something like "test-on-borrow" (or test-on-return) so that this would send each time a
connection is taken out of the pool (or returned).

I don't think the driver sends this "on its own" without any trigger from the application.
The statement is sent if Connection.setClientInfo() is called, so maybe that called from somewhere in your application or the connection pool.







--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Dave Cramer
Date:
Daniel,

Thanks for the taking the time to do this. 


On 26 November 2015 at 02:27, Daniel Blanch Bataller <dblanch@hoplasoftware.com> wrote:
Hi everyone, this is my first post, so forgive me If I’m not respecting any protocol rule I haven’t read.

I’ve run a small test, the driver doesn’t do that by it’s own on every statement if it’s inside a pool and correctly configured, i’m using bdcp. See by yourself:

public DbcpExperiment() throws Exception {
initializePool();
}

protected void initializePool() {
basicDataSource = new BasicDataSource();
basicDataSource.setDriverClassName("org.postgresql.Driver");
basicDataSource.setUsername("test");
basicDataSource.setPassword("test");
basicDataSource.setUrl("jdbc:postgresql://127.0.0.1:5432/test?ApplicationName=DbcpExperiment");
basicDataSource.setInitialSize(1);
basicDataSource.setMaxIdle(1);  
basicDataSource.setMaxActive(1);
basicDataSource.setDefaultAutoCommit(false);
}

public void testApplicationName() throws Exception {


Connection connection = null;


for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
connection = basicDataSource.getConnection();
PreparedStatement preparedStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT 1");
preparedStatement.executeQuery();
connection.commit();
connection.close();
System.out.println(i);
}


}

test=# select calls, total_time, query FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY calls DESC;
 calls |    total_time    |                  query                  
-------+------------------+-----------------------------------------
  1000 | 4.85599999999995 | SELECT ?
  1000 |            0.446 | BEGIN
  1000 |            0.468 | COMMIT
     2 |            0.057 | SET application_name = 'DbcpExperiment'
     2 |            0.049 | SET extra_float_digits = 3
     1 |            0.232 | SELECT pg_stat_statements_reset();
(6 rows)

test=# 


Pom snippet:
==========

<dependencies>
<dependency>
    <groupId>commons-dbcp</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-dbcp</artifactId>
<version>1.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.postgresql</groupId>
<artifactId>postgresql</artifactId>
<version>9.4-1201-jdbc4</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>


Regards

- Daniel 



El 25 nov 2015, a las 19:25, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> escribió:

Fabio Caiut schrieb am 25.11.2015 um 16:20:
I'm trying to understand the "SET application_name" command sent by the driver.

We have a database server with high concurrency, ~25K TPS, and looking the top queries (with pg_stat_statements view)
I get it's the query taking more time.

The command is very fast but the number of calls is huge.


TOP 10 Queries (only ~2 hours collecting)


  calls   | total_time | avg_time |   rows   | avg_rows | hit_percent |
----------+------------+----------+----------+----------+-------------+------------------------------
 55782793 | 8212550.69 |     0.15 |        0 |     0.00 |             | SET application_name = ''
  4425751 |  322475.14 |     0.07 |   138606 |     0.00 |       98.98 | /* load one-to-many ...
  4097384 |  963780.17 |     0.24 |    84514 |     0.00 |       99.77 | /* load ...
  3908144 |  366598.92 |     0.09 |  3834578 |     0.00 |      100.00 | /* load ...
  2596097 |  480030.01 |     0.18 |  2596097 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* SELECT count(*) FROM ...
  2365353 |  290965.73 |     0.12 |  2365335 |     0.00 |       99.99 | /* load ...
  2081011 |  127373.91 |     0.06 |   379289 |     0.00 |       99.59 | /* load collection ...
  1303931 |  145544.50 |     0.11 |  1303925 |     0.00 |       95.94 | /* load ...
  1274982 |  577683.73 |     0.45 |  1274982 |     1.00 |      100.00 | /* Select count(*) from ...
  1203475 | 1522327.87 |     1.26 |  4405775 |     3.00 |       89.44 | /* load ...


It takes ~8K seconds, more than 2 hours, it means that this command can use more than one core all the time! (if I'm understanding right)

I'm thinking as the application name is empty maybe this command could be avoid.
I have asked our Glassfish people to "unmark" this option if possible but they told me they don't know how to do it, where to do it.

I'm not sure if the quantity of calls is a problem in application, in glassfish or in driver.
But, if it's possible tune to avoid it, I would like that.


Is it possible that this is configured as a "connection test" statement with your connection pool in Glassfish?
Including something like "test-on-borrow" (or test-on-return) so that this would send each time a
connection is taken out of the pool (or returned).

I don't think the driver sends this "on its own" without any trigger from the application.
The statement is sent if Connection.setClientInfo() is called, so maybe that called from somewhere in your application or the connection pool.







--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc


Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Fabio Caiut
Date:
Hi, 
Vladimir, Thomas ... you're right.

The glassfish guys analyzed dumps and look in the glassfish sources, the problem is there. 
They told me pool calls setClientInfo for each query!! 

Thank you for your help.

Caiut


> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:54:56 +0300
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] How to avoid SET application_name = ''
> From: sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com
> To: caiut@hotmail.com
> CC: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
>
> As far as I can tell, there is no option to completely disable "set
> application_name" feature via property.
>
> Is SQL appears when client calls
> Connection#setClientInfo("ApplicationName", ...) or
> Connection#setClientInfo(Properties).
>
> It make sense to avoid setting the same application name again and
> again for the same connection.
> Can you please file an issue at https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues?
>
> In the mean time, it would be good if you could capture thread dumps
> from the application (e.g. 100 dumps with 10 second intervals under
> typical load) and grep setClientInfo. That would point out the line in
> code that issues that excessive setClientInfo.
>
> Vladimir

Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Dave Cramer
Date:
Fabio,

Thanks for the update. Glad we could help.

Now make sure you are using 1206. There is a serious bug in 1205


On 26 November 2015 at 11:35, Fabio Caiut <caiut@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 
Vladimir, Thomas ... you're right.

The glassfish guys analyzed dumps and look in the glassfish sources, the problem is there. 
They told me pool calls setClientInfo for each query!! 

Thank you for your help.

Caiut


> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:54:56 +0300
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] How to avoid SET application_name = ''
> From: sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com
> To: caiut@hotmail.com
> CC: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
>
> As far as I can tell, there is no option to completely disable "set
> application_name" feature via property.
>
> Is SQL appears when client calls
> Connection#setClientInfo("ApplicationName", ...) or
> Connection#setClientInfo(Properties).
>
> It make sense to avoid setting the same application name again and
> again for the same connection.
> Can you please file an issue at https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues?
>
> In the mean time, it would be good if you could capture thread dumps
> from the application (e.g. 100 dumps with 10 second intervals under
> typical load) and grep setClientInfo. That would point out the line in
> code that issues that excessive setClientInfo.
>
> Vladimir

Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Craig Ringer
Date:


On 27 November 2015 at 00:35, Fabio Caiut <caiut@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 
Vladimir, Thomas ... you're right.

The glassfish guys analyzed dumps and look in the glassfish sources, the problem is there. 
They told me pool calls setClientInfo for each query!! 


If an application_name is passed on the JDBC URL, PgJDBC should really send it in the startup packet, not a follow-up SET anyway. I haven't checked to see if it currently does.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Re: How to avoid SET application_name = ''

From
Sehrope Sarkuni
Date:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 27 November 2015 at 00:35, Fabio Caiut <caiut@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 
Vladimir, Thomas ... you're right.

The glassfish guys analyzed dumps and look in the glassfish sources, the problem is there. 
They told me pool calls setClientInfo for each query!! 


If an application_name is passed on the JDBC URL, PgJDBC should really send it in the startup packet, not a follow-up SET anyway. I haven't checked to see if it currently does.

Yes if the connection property "assumeMinServerVersion" is set to at least 9.0 then the application_name will be set in the start up packet (rather than as a separate query after the connection is established). There's no default value though as older server versions will not support it.

Regards,
-- Sehrope Sarkuni