Thread: patch to avoid a NullPointerException
I have observed a NullPointerException raised in PGobject.equals(). The attached patch checks for a null value and avoids raising an exception. I am working with an application which makes extensive use of user-defined types, particularly enums, and also uses EclipseLink. I found it necessary to create EclipseLink converters to convert from the Java representation of the user-defined types to a PGobject so that PgJDBC sends the correct type information to the PostgreSQL server. It appears to be necessary to create an PGobject instance with the correct type label and a null value in order to store a NULL in a column with a user-defined type. However, this results in a NullPointerException when EclipseLink tests the two PGobject instances for equality. -Derrick
Attachment
Derrick,
Thanks, applied
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Derrick Hudson <dsh@dman13.dyndns.org> wrote:
I have observed a NullPointerException raised in PGobject.equals().
The attached patch checks for a null value and avoids raising an
exception.
I am working with an application which makes extensive use of
user-defined types, particularly enums, and also uses EclipseLink. I
found it necessary to create EclipseLink converters to convert from
the Java representation of the user-defined types to a PGobject so
that PgJDBC sends the correct type information to the PostgreSQL
server. It appears to be necessary to create an PGobject instance
with the correct type label and a null value in order to store a NULL
in a column with a user-defined type. However, this results in a
NullPointerException when EclipseLink tests the two PGobject instances
for equality.
-Derrick
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Dave Cramer wrote: > Derrick, > Thanks, applied > Shouldn't this be backpatched to all stable branches? Kris Jurka
Ya, I would think so too. I'm just trying to knock what I can in my limited available time.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Derrick,
> Thanks, applied
>
Shouldn't this be backpatched to all stable branches?
Kris Jurka
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Dave Cramer wrote: > Ya, I would think so too. I'm just trying to knock what I can in my limited > available time. > I have backpatched this to all relevant versions. Kris Jurka