Thread: Unified setBlobs / setBinaryStream question
Hello,
At the old JDBC driver documentation there is a string about moving set/getBlob to use BYTEA type:
Note: In a future release of the JDBC Driver, the
At the recent JDBC driver documentation this line is absent. Does it mean that roadmap plans are changed?
--
WBR,
PAV.
At the old JDBC driver documentation there is a string about moving set/getBlob to use BYTEA type:
Note: In a future release of the JDBC Driver, the
getBLOB()
and setBLOB()
methods may no longer interact with Large Objects and will instead work on bytea data types. So it is recommended that you use the LargeObject
API if you intend to use Large Objects. At the recent JDBC driver documentation this line is absent. Does it mean that roadmap plans are changed?
--
WBR,
PAV.
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Pavel Milovantsev wrote: > At the old JDBC driver documentation there is a string about moving > set/getBlob to use BYTEA type: > > Note: In a future release of the JDBC Driver, the getBLOB() and setBLOB() > methods may no longer interact with Large Objects and will instead work on > bytea data types. So it is recommended that you use the LargeObject API if > you intend to use Large Objects. > > At the recent JDBC driver documentation this line is absent. Does it mean > that roadmap plans are changed? > There are no current plans to change get/setBlob to work on bytea. Kris Jurka