Thread: Re: Concurrent Connections - User only allowed one
I didn't think you needed to HUP postmaster if you were changing pg_hba.conf ? GTG >>> Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net> 03/10/2003 15:48:49 >>> and you HUPPED postmaster after changing this? --dc-- On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 10:32, Gordon Ross wrote: > OK, error from server.log: > > FATAL: No pg_hba.conf entry for host 192.168.24.108, user postgres, database switchboards > > entries in pg_hba.conf: > > # TYPE DATABASE USER IP-ADDRESS IP-MASK METHOD > > local all all trust > host all all 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 trust > host all all 192.168.24.108 255.255.255.255 trust > > 192.168.24.108 is my PCs IP address.
"Gordon Ross" <G.Ross@ccw.gov.uk> writes: > I didn't think you needed to HUP postmaster if you were changing > pg_hba.conf ? You certainly do (in recent releases anyway). I also thought there might be merit in the suggestion that you were changing the wrong copy of pg_hba.conf ... regards, tom lane
On 03/10/2003 16:04 Gordon Ross wrote: > I didn't think you needed to HUP postmaster if you were changing > pg_hba.conf ? 'fraid so. It's documented near the end of section 6.1. "The pg_hba.conf file is read on start-up and when the postmaster receives a SIGHUP signal." -- Paul Thomas +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller Business | | Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk | +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+