Thread: JDBC: Better initial capacity for StringBuffers reduces memory usage

JDBC: Better initial capacity for StringBuffers reduces memory usage

From
Fernando Nasser
Date:
Regardless of the streaming patches that are floating around, we should fix the
allocation of the StringBuffers.

On the AbstractJdbc1Statement one, the initial space allocated for the buffer
will never be enough because of the quotes, so we end up using 3 times the size
of the object + 1 and having to copy it from the initial buffer to the double
size one. Instead of just adding '+2' I gave it some slack for the escaping of
quotes.

The one in PGbytea may raise some eyebrows, but I can guarantee you that it
_always_ win, when compared to allocate just the object size for at least that
amount of space.

The changes above reduce by 33% (in the worst case) the memory requirements for
uploading data (without the streaming patches).  Although not that important for
smaller data types (once the streaming is in place we will not send large ones
through this path anymore), there is no reason to waste memory so I suggest we
check this in.

Regards to all.


--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9
Index: src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -c -p -r1.21 AbstractJdbc1Statement.java
*** src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java    2003/05/03 20:40:45    1.21
--- src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java    2003/05/14 05:58:21
*************** public abstract class AbstractJdbc1State
*** 1020,1026 ****
              synchronized (sbuf)
              {
                  sbuf.setLength(0);
!                 sbuf.ensureCapacity(x.length());
                  int i;

                  sbuf.append('\'');
--- 1020,1026 ----
              synchronized (sbuf)
              {
                  sbuf.setLength(0);
!                 sbuf.ensureCapacity(x.length() + (int)(x.length() / 10));
                  int i;

                  sbuf.append('\'');
Index: src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -c -p -r1.7 PGbytea.java
*** src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java    2003/03/07 18:39:46    1.7
--- src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java    2003/05/14 05:58:22
*************** public class PGbytea
*** 68,74 ****
      {
          if (p_buf == null)
              return null;
!         StringBuffer l_strbuf = new StringBuffer(p_buf.length);
          for (int i = 0; i < p_buf.length; i++)
          {
              int l_int = (int)p_buf[i];
--- 68,74 ----
      {
          if (p_buf == null)
              return null;
!         StringBuffer l_strbuf = new StringBuffer(2 * p_buf.length);
          for (int i = 0; i < p_buf.length; i++)
          {
              int l_int = (int)p_buf[i];

Re: JDBC: Better initial capacity for StringBuffers reduces

From
Barry Lind
Date:
Fernando,

Patch applied to CVS head.

thanks,
--Barry


Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Regardless of the streaming patches that are floating around, we should
> fix the allocation of the StringBuffers.
>
> On the AbstractJdbc1Statement one, the initial space allocated for the
> buffer will never be enough because of the quotes, so we end up using 3
> times the size of the object + 1 and having to copy it from the initial
> buffer to the double size one. Instead of just adding '+2' I gave it
> some slack for the escaping of quotes.
>
> The one in PGbytea may raise some eyebrows, but I can guarantee you that
> it _always_ win, when compared to allocate just the object size for at
> least that amount of space.
>
> The changes above reduce by 33% (in the worst case) the memory
> requirements for uploading data (without the streaming patches).
> Although not that important for smaller data types (once the streaming
> is in place we will not send large ones through this path anymore),
> there is no reason to waste memory so I suggest we check this in.
>
> Regards to all.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -c -p -r1.21 AbstractJdbc1Statement.java
> *** src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java    2003/05/03 20:40:45    1.21
> --- src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1Statement.java    2003/05/14 05:58:21
> *************** public abstract class AbstractJdbc1State
> *** 1020,1026 ****
>               synchronized (sbuf)
>               {
>                   sbuf.setLength(0);
> !                 sbuf.ensureCapacity(x.length());
>                   int i;
>
>                   sbuf.append('\'');
> --- 1020,1026 ----
>               synchronized (sbuf)
>               {
>                   sbuf.setLength(0);
> !                 sbuf.ensureCapacity(x.length() + (int)(x.length() / 10));
>                   int i;
>
>                   sbuf.append('\'');
> Index: src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -c -p -r1.7 PGbytea.java
> *** src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java    2003/03/07 18:39:46    1.7
> --- src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/util/PGbytea.java    2003/05/14 05:58:22
> *************** public class PGbytea
> *** 68,74 ****
>       {
>           if (p_buf == null)
>               return null;
> !         StringBuffer l_strbuf = new StringBuffer(p_buf.length);
>           for (int i = 0; i < p_buf.length; i++)
>           {
>               int l_int = (int)p_buf[i];
> --- 68,74 ----
>       {
>           if (p_buf == null)
>               return null;
> !         StringBuffer l_strbuf = new StringBuffer(2 * p_buf.length);
>           for (int i = 0; i < p_buf.length; i++)
>           {
>               int l_int = (int)p_buf[i];
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org