Thread: odbc.sql?
Hi! The file odbc.sql, previously in src/interfaces but removed after 7.2 and moved to gborg, is it still needed if a PostgreSQL server is to be compliant with ODBC in some respect? Do I need to run it on databases (or template1) if want, say, Windows machines connect using ODBC to a PostgreSQL server on unix? If so, isn't the file really tucked away too deeply - IMO it is not part of the odbc client code, or at least it should also be distributed with the more used psqlODBC project, right? <http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbcplus/cvs/co.php/psqlodbcplus/odbc.sql?r=1.1.1.1> Regards, Palle PS. Anybody knows why the gborg site is always so *extremely* slow, esp the webcvs? DS
Palle Girgensohn wrote: > If so, isn't the file really tucked away too deeply - IMO it is not > part of the odbc client code, or at least it should also be > distributed with the more used psqlODBC project, right? It is distributed with psqlODBC. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Am Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 09:58 schrieb Palle Girgensohn: > > It is distributed with psqlODBC. > > Well, maybe it is, but then how come it's not in the cvs repository? Because it has been removed in the CVS head. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
--On torsdag, februari 03, 2005 07.53.48 +0100 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> If so, isn't the file really tucked away too deeply - IMO it is not >> part of the odbc client code, or at least it should also be >> distributed with the more used psqlODBC project, right? > > It is distributed with psqlODBC. Well, maybe it is, but then how come it's not in the cvs repository? /Palle