Thread: Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22
> I am not sure about the malloc errors, but the "isn't numeric" errors > should be fixed by grabbing an updated version of DBD::Pg. This is DBD-Pg-1.22, do you mean newer than that? > By the way, the latest stable version of perl is 5.8.0. You may want > to consider jumping to that as long as you are upgrading. The only thing is that I have heard suggestions that replacing the stock perl on OS X with 5.8 can cause problems with certain system functions -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> I am not sure about the malloc errors, but the "isn't numeric" errors >> should be fixed by grabbing an updated version of DBD::Pg. > This is DBD-Pg-1.22, do you mean newer than that? Yes, sorry I was not clear. The latest CVS version should cleanly work around the versioning problem. In particular, you should be able to replace just the file "Pg.pm" to fix that problem: http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/dbdpg/cvs/cvs.php/dbdpg >> By the way, the latest stable version of perl is 5.8.0. You may want >> to consider jumping to that as long as you are upgrading. > The only thing is that I have heard suggestions that replacing the stock > perl on OS X with 5.8 can cause problems with certain system functions Forgot about the OS X factor. Nevermind. :) You want 5.6.1r2. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200304080959 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+ktaVvJuQZxSWSsgRAmfbAKCaBsg82LsLGry5HJ+iP0qUfJtcQACfcm4C 8q0kk3kTJEZgGVz16JzW+/Q= =3Lw2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----