Thread: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
> >> Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind of > >> correct. > > Actually, the window is called "Relationships", not "Relations".... Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something? Iavor
>> > >> Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind >> > >> of correct. >> > >> > Actually, the window is called "Relationships", not >> > "Relations".... >> >> Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something? Not really, I was just following up on the discussion about the incorrect use of the term Relations by MS Access. I don't think that Relationships is a bad tab label - except that it's a bit long for the current size tabs :). Access's Relationships are all placed on one canvas, regardless of whether or not there are several independent diagrams present. If this model is to be used by pgaccess, it would make just as much sense to put 'Relationships' into the Database menu instead of a tab, since the New, Open, and Design actions would not mean anything. the-$0.02-of-an-old-Access-developer-wishing-the-best-to-pgaccess ... terry
Iavor and terry: > >> Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something? > > Not really, I was just following up on the discussion about the > incorrect use of the term Relations by MS Access. I don't think that > Relationships is a bad tab label - except that it's a bit > long for the > current size tabs :). > > Access's Relationships are all placed on one canvas, regardless of > whether or not there are several independent diagrams > present. If this > model is to be used by pgaccess, it would make just as much sense to > put 'Relationships' into the Database menu instead of a tab, > since the > New, Open, and Design actions would not mean anything. > > the-$0.02-of-an-old-Access-developer-wishing-the-best-to-pgaccess ... There are no tabs anymore. The new interface is... you should download and see it. Also - there was the idea to rename 'Schema' to 'Diagrams' as there can be many such - snapshots of different parts of the database. Useful when one has to write a documentation (I did this once). And then - a 'visual referential integrity manager' (a future feature) that will allow referential integrity to be viewed/created/edited in a visual manner. So - for the native speakers - there is an option the 'Visual referential integrity manager' to be called 'Relationships'. Any native comments? Iavor