Thread: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

From
"Chr. Rossmanith"
Date:
Hi,

I need psqlodbc for postgres 7.0.2. Unfortunately I don't have MS Visual
C++ as mentioned in the readme. So my question is if  someone out there
has already compiled psqlodbc.dll for Win32 and is willing to share
it...

Christina Rossmanith



Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

From
Kovacs Zoltan Sandor
Date:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I need psqlodbc for postgres 7.0.2. Unfortunately I don't have MS Visual
> C++ as mentioned in the readme. So my question is if  someone out there
> has already compiled psqlodbc.dll for Win32 and is willing to share
> it...
Yes, sure. :-)
(In fact you can compile it with Borland C++ Builder as well. Currently I 
have no other information about successful compilation in any other
development kit.)

I have two different drivers, both handle the referential integrity
check reporting. They can be reached via anonymous ftp:
ftp://pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu/home/kovacsz/Linux/PostgreSQL/WinODBC/Max/psqlodbc.dll
and 
ftp://pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu/home/kovacsz/Linux/PostgreSQL/WinODBC/psqlodbc.dll

Both are patched versions of the official v6.5 driver. The first one is
made by Max Khon. Please let us know if any of them were useful for you if
you are using the referential integrity parts of Postgres.

Zoltan



Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

From
"Adam Lang"
Date:
Just to make sure I'm following correctly, this is the same thing as the
postdrv.exe to download for the ODBC driver, correct?

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kovacs Zoltan Sandor" <tip@pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu>
To: "Chr. Rossmanith" <cr@neuro.ma.uni-heidelberg.de>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc


> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Chr. Rossmanith wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need psqlodbc for postgres 7.0.2. Unfortunately I don't have MS Visual
> > C++ as mentioned in the readme. So my question is if  someone out there
> > has already compiled psqlodbc.dll for Win32 and is willing to share
> > it...
> Yes, sure. :-)
> (In fact you can compile it with Borland C++ Builder as well. Currently I
> have no other information about successful compilation in any other
> development kit.)
>
> I have two different drivers, both handle the referential integrity
> check reporting. They can be reached via anonymous ftp:
>
ftp://pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu/home/kovacsz/Linux/PostgreSQL/WinODBC/M
ax/psqlodbc.dll
> and
>
ftp://pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu/home/kovacsz/Linux/PostgreSQL/WinODBC/p
sqlodbc.dll
>
> Both are patched versions of the official v6.5 driver. The first one is
> made by Max Khon. Please let us know if any of them were useful for you if
> you are using the referential integrity parts of Postgres.
>
> Zoltan



Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

From
kovacsz
Date:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Adam Lang wrote:

> Just to make sure I'm following correctly, this is the same thing as the
> postdrv.exe to download for the ODBC driver, correct?
No. They are newer, unless your postdrv.exe is newer than 1 week.

Zoltan




Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

From
"Adam Lang"
Date:
So what is the difference between them?  Same thing, just someone else's
implementation?

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "kovacsz" <zoli@pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc


> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Adam Lang wrote:
>
> > Just to make sure I'm following correctly, this is the same thing as the
> > postdrv.exe to download for the ODBC driver, correct?
> No. They are newer, unless your postdrv.exe is newer than 1 week.
>
> Zoltan
>



Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc

From
Kovacs Zoltan Sandor
Date:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Adam Lang wrote:

> So what is the difference between them?  Same thing, just someone else's
> implementation?
They can handle the referential integrity violation reporting. The second
one does a bit more, it has a better transaction handling in my opinion.

Zoltan