Thread: RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From
Peter Mount
Date:
Hmmm, I could add a rule just for Kaffe that does include all of them.
I'd prefer keeping the existing rule for most cases (as it prevents
every file being compiled every time), but it should only be 3 lines...

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 2:13 PM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: 'Thomas Lockhart'; Tom Lane; Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development;
PostgreSQL-interfaces; Peter Mount (Home)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status


> PM: I'm actually sneeking one day time here (shouldn't but will) so
> things should be better by the end of today. I'm about to get a JDK
> installed under NT, just to give an extra platform to test under.

I talked to the Kaffe folks and compiling mutually dependent java files
must be done by compiling them all at the same time:
java a.java b.java

Seems it is a kaffe limitation/bug.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania
19026


Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
> Hmmm, I could add a rule just for Kaffe that does include all of them.
> I'd prefer keeping the existing rule for most cases (as it prevents
> every file being compiled every time), but it should only be 3 lines...
> 

It then fails with a missing java.sql.Blob, so it seems the java
sql libraries are not fully implemented.  I would forget about it for
now.  Thanks.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026