Thread: Pgbench with -f and -S
Hi,
Pgbench allows -f and -S combinations together where the doc says that -S effectively uses the internal select-only script.
Is it okay to assume that -f is disregarded here? Or are they run in round-robin fashion (although then, how does it know which read-only part of my script to run?) or something else like that?
Effectively, I think it should raise NOTICE that -f is useless here.
-
robins
--
-
robins
> Pgbench allows -f and -S combinations together where the doc says that -S > effectively uses the internal select-only script. > > Is it okay to assume that -f is disregarded here? Or are they run in > round-robin fashion (although then, how does it know which read-only part > of my script to run?) or something else like that? > > Effectively, I think it should raise NOTICE that -f is useless here. For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be combined. Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores, when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warned about. -- Fabien.
On 17 April 2016 at 21:24, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be combined.
Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores, when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warned about.
Thanks Fabien, for confirming about the missing warning.
Also, by 'combined' I think you mean that both (built-in SELECTs & Custom Script) run, although the dev docs don't (yet) say anything about that.
-
robins
robins
>> For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be >> combined. >> >> Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores, >> when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warned about. > > Thanks Fabien, for confirming about the missing warning. > > Also, by 'combined' I think you mean that both (built-in SELECTs & Custom > Script) run, although the dev docs don't (yet) say anything about that. Hmmm... I think it does implicitely, with "add" and "and" in the following: From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/pgbench.html: -b scriptname[@weight] Add the specified builtin script to the list of executed scripts. [...] Idem -f. And later at the beginning of the Notes: pgbench executes test scripts chosen randomly from a specified list. They include built-in scripts with -b and user-providedcustom scripts with -f. [...] -- Fabien.
<div dir="ltr">Got it. Thanks for explaining that. Was looking at -S earlier and didn't notice the new -b and @ weight optionsin 9.6devel.</div><br /><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 at 10:54 Fabien COELHO <<ahref="mailto:coelho@cri.ensmp.fr">coelho@cri.ensmp.fr</a>> wrote:<br /></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:00 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br /> >> For the future 9.6, scripts optionsare cumulatives, so -f & -S can be<br /> >> combined.<br /> >><br /> >> Indeed, for the <=9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores,<br /> >> when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept,it should be warned about.<br /> > <br /> > Thanks Fabien, for confirming about the missing warning.<br /> ><br/> > Also, by 'combined' I think you mean that both (built-in SELECTs & Custom<br /> > Script) run, althoughthe dev docs don't (yet) say anything about that.<br /><br /> Hmmm... I think it does implicitely, with "add" and"and" in the<br /> following:<br /><br /> From <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/pgbench.html" rel="noreferrer"target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/pgbench.html</a>:<br /><br /> -b scriptname[@weight]<br/> Add the specified builtin script to the list of executed scripts. [...]<br /><br /> Idem -f.<br/><br /> And later at the beginning of the Notes:<br /><br /> pgbench executes test scripts chosen randomly froma specified list.<br /> They include built-in scripts with -b and user-provided custom scripts with -f.<br /> [...]<br/><br /> --<br /> Fabien.</blockquote></div><div dir="ltr">-- <br /></div><div dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">-<br /> robins</div>