Thread: Small patch: --disable-setproctitle flag

Small patch: --disable-setproctitle flag

From
Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Hello

Recently I discovered that renaming processes using setproctitle() call
on BSD systems may sometimes cause problems. For instance there is
currently a bug in all versions of LLDB which makes it impossible to
debug a process that called setproctitle():

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26924#c3

Since LLVM stack is used by default in FreeBSD I believe it's quite a
severe problem. In case there is other software that doesn't handle
stproctitle() well and for users of LLDB <= 3.8 (most recent version)
I propose to add a --disable-setproctitle flag to configure script.
Corresponding patch is attached.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
http://eax.me/

Attachment

Re: Small patch: --disable-setproctitle flag

From
Andres Freund
Date:
On 2016-03-31 13:06:05 +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hello
> 
> Recently I discovered that renaming processes using setproctitle() call
> on BSD systems may sometimes cause problems. For instance there is
> currently a bug in all versions of LLDB which makes it impossible to
> debug a process that called setproctitle():
> 
> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26924#c3
> 
> Since LLVM stack is used by default in FreeBSD I believe it's quite a
> severe problem. In case there is other software that doesn't handle
> stproctitle() well and for users of LLDB <= 3.8 (most recent version)
> I propose to add a --disable-setproctitle flag to configure script.
> Corresponding patch is attached.

Seems more appropriate to simply manually add a #undef HAVE_SETPROCTITLE
to pg_config_manual.h in that case. Adding configure flags for ephemeral
debugger issues seems like a high churn activity.

Andres



Re: Small patch: --disable-setproctitle flag

From
Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Hello, Andres

> Seems more appropriate to simply manually add a #undef
> HAVE_SETPROCTITLE to pg_config_manual.h in that case. Adding
> configure flags for ephemeral debugger issues seems like a high churn
> activity.

I think you are right. OK.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
http://eax.me/