Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.
Sorry for not having completely followed the thread of logical
replication, but wouldn't this deserve some documentation?
Regards,
-- 
Michael

On 2013-12-11 09:54:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.
> Sorry for not having completely followed the thread of logical
> replication, but wouldn't this deserve some documentation?

I'd say this needs to be documented when the later facilities are
committed. It seems hard to explain without that context.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-11 09:54:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> > Add a new reloption, user_catalog_table.
>> Sorry for not having completely followed the thread of logical
>> replication, but wouldn't this deserve some documentation?
>
> I'd say this needs to be documented when the later facilities are
> committed. It seems hard to explain without that context.

I actually think Michael is right.  There's no reason this can't or
shouldn't get a mention in <title
id="SQL-CREATETABLE-storage-parameters-title">Storage
Parameters</title> at the very least.  We might not have the right
stuff to hyperlink to for more details yet, but we can at least get
the basic bits in there.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company