On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-09-17 23:12:24 -0700, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
>> How safe is it to use the technique described by the link below with
>> system catalog tables to remove bloat?
>> (in a couple of words it is about moving tuples to the beginning of
>> the table with a special way of updating)
>> http://www.depesz.com/2010/10/17/reduce-bloat-of-table-without-longexclusive-locks/
>
> At least for pg_index it's not safe, we use the xmin of rows when
> indcheckxmin = true.
> I am not aware of other cases, but I'd be hesitant to do so.
Thank you, Andres, I did not know this. Just wondering, why it was
made of type bool and not xid?
> You have bloat because of lots of temporary tables IIRC?
Actually I am developing a bloat removing tool based on the updating technique:
https://code.google.com/p/pgtoolkit/source/browse/trunk/README
Now the --system-catalog feature marked as experimental. About
pg_index - I think the solution is to exclude it from processing
strictly.
Anyone has other ideas of what system tables it might be affected
except pg_index?
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray.ru@gmail.com
