Thread: Assertion failure when promoting node by deleting recovery.conf and restart node

Assertion failure when promoting node by deleting recovery.conf and restart node

From
Michael Paquier
Date:
Hi,

When trying to *promote* a slave as master by removing recovery.conf and restarting node, I found an assertion failure on master branch:
LOG:  database system was shut down in recovery at 2013-03-15 10:22:27 JST
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI != 1)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 4954)
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007f95af03b2c5 in raise () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x00007f95af03c748 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x000000000086ce71 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x8f2af0 "!(ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI != 1)", errorType=0x8f0813 "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x8f076b "xlog.c",
    lineNumber=4954) at assert.c:54
#3  0x00000000004fe499 in StartupXLOG () at xlog.c:4954
#4  0x00000000006f9d34 in StartupProcessMain () at startup.c:224
#5  0x000000000050ef92 in AuxiliaryProcessMain (argc=2, argv=0x7fffa6fc3d20) at bootstrap.c:423
#6  0x00000000006f8816 in StartChildProcess (type=StartupProcess) at postmaster.c:4956
#7  0x00000000006f39e9 in PostmasterMain (argc=6, argv=0x1c950a0) at postmaster.c:1237
#8  0x000000000065d59b in main (argc=6, argv=0x1c950a0) at main.c:197
Ok, this is not the cleanest way to promote a node as it doesn't do any safety checks relation at promotion but 9.2 and previous versions allowed to do that properly.

The assertion has been introduced by commit 3f0ab05 in order to record properly minRecoveryPointTLI in control file at the end of recovery in the case of a crash.
However, in the case of a slave node properly shutdown in recovery which is then restarted as a master, the code path of this assertion is taken.
What do you think of the patch attached? It avoids the update of recoveryTargetTLI and recoveryTargetIsLatest if the node has been shutdown while in recovery.
Another possibility could be to add in the assertion some conditions based on the state of controlFile but I think it is more consistent simply not to update those fields.

Regards,
--
Michael
Attachment

Re: Assertion failure when promoting node by deleting recovery.conf and restart node

From
Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
On 15.03.2013 04:25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When trying to *promote* a slave as master by removing recovery.conf and
> restarting node, I found an assertion failure on master branch:
> LOG:  database system was shut down in recovery at 2013-03-15 10:22:27 JST
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI != 1)", File:
> "xlog.c", Line: 4954)
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x00007f95af03b2c5 in raise () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
> #1  0x00007f95af03c748 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
> #2  0x000000000086ce71 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x8f2af0
> "!(ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI != 1)", errorType=0x8f0813
> "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x8f076b "xlog.c",
>      lineNumber=4954) at assert.c:54
> #3  0x00000000004fe499 in StartupXLOG () at xlog.c:4954
> #4  0x00000000006f9d34 in StartupProcessMain () at startup.c:224
> #5  0x000000000050ef92 in AuxiliaryProcessMain (argc=2,
> argv=0x7fffa6fc3d20) at bootstrap.c:423
> #6  0x00000000006f8816 in StartChildProcess (type=StartupProcess) at
> postmaster.c:4956
> #7  0x00000000006f39e9 in PostmasterMain (argc=6, argv=0x1c950a0) at
> postmaster.c:1237
> #8  0x000000000065d59b in main (argc=6, argv=0x1c950a0) at main.c:197
> Ok, this is not the cleanest way to promote a node as it doesn't do any
> safety checks relation at promotion but 9.2 and previous versions allowed
> to do that properly.
>
> The assertion has been introduced by commit 3f0ab05 in order to record
> properly minRecoveryPointTLI in control file at the end of recovery in the
> case of a crash.
> However, in the case of a slave node properly shutdown in recovery which is
> then restarted as a master, the code path of this assertion is taken.
> What do you think of the patch attached? It avoids the update of
> recoveryTargetTLI and recoveryTargetIsLatest if the node has been shutdown
> while in recovery.
> Another possibility could be to add in the assertion some conditions based
> on the state of controlFile but I think it is more consistent simply not to
> update those fields.

Simon, can you comment on this? ISTM we could just remove the assertion 
and update the comment to mention that this can happen. If there is a 
min recovery point, surely we always need to recover to the timeline 
containing that point, so setting recoveryTargetTLI to 
minRecoveryPointTLI seems sensible.

- Heikki



On 25 March 2013 19:14, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:

> Simon, can you comment on this?

Yes, will do.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



On 25 March 2013 19:14, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> On 15.03.2013 04:25, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When trying to *promote* a slave as master by removing recovery.conf and
>> restarting node, I found an assertion failure on master branch:
>> LOG:  database system was shut down in recovery at 2013-03-15 10:22:27 JST
>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI != 1)", File:
>> "xlog.c", Line: 4954)
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x00007f95af03b2c5 in raise () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
>> #1  0x00007f95af03c748 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6
>> #2  0x000000000086ce71 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x8f2af0
>> "!(ControlFile->minRecoveryPointTLI != 1)", errorType=0x8f0813
>> "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x8f076b "xlog.c",
>>      lineNumber=4954) at assert.c:54
>> #3  0x00000000004fe499 in StartupXLOG () at xlog.c:4954
>> #4  0x00000000006f9d34 in StartupProcessMain () at startup.c:224
>> #5  0x000000000050ef92 in AuxiliaryProcessMain (argc=2,
>> argv=0x7fffa6fc3d20) at bootstrap.c:423
>> #6  0x00000000006f8816 in StartChildProcess (type=StartupProcess) at
>> postmaster.c:4956
>> #7  0x00000000006f39e9 in PostmasterMain (argc=6, argv=0x1c950a0) at
>> postmaster.c:1237
>> #8  0x000000000065d59b in main (argc=6, argv=0x1c950a0) at main.c:197
>> Ok, this is not the cleanest way to promote a node as it doesn't do any
>> safety checks relation at promotion but 9.2 and previous versions allowed
>> to do that properly.
>>
>> The assertion has been introduced by commit 3f0ab05 in order to record
>> properly minRecoveryPointTLI in control file at the end of recovery in the
>> case of a crash.
>> However, in the case of a slave node properly shutdown in recovery which
>> is
>> then restarted as a master, the code path of this assertion is taken.
>> What do you think of the patch attached? It avoids the update of
>> recoveryTargetTLI and recoveryTargetIsLatest if the node has been shutdown
>> while in recovery.
>> Another possibility could be to add in the assertion some conditions based
>> on the state of controlFile but I think it is more consistent simply not
>> to
>> update those fields.
>
>
> Simon, can you comment on this? ISTM we could just remove the assertion and
> update the comment to mention that this can happen. If there is a min
> recovery point, surely we always need to recover to the timeline containing
> that point, so setting recoveryTargetTLI to minRecoveryPointTLI seems
> sensible.

Fixed using the latest TLI available and removing the assertion.

--Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services