Thread: Old postgresql repository
When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think. Comments? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old > postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had > clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from > cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current > git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's > available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary > > I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active > clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think. > > Comments? OK by me. Thanks for holding off. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:31:53PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old > postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had > clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from > cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current > git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's > available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary > > I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active > clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think. > > Comments? "...Linus will know his own" ;) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 16:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old > postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had > clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from > cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current > git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's > available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary > > I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active > clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think. That's OK with me. Regards,Jeff Davis
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 17:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old >> postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had >> clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from >> cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current >> git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's >> available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary >> >> I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active >> clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think. >> >> Comments? > > OK by me. Thanks for holding off. Dropped, will be gone on the next resync. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/