Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible
From
Robert Haas
Date:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible place > > The order on the pg_dump/pg_dumpall man pages is not very strict, but > surely putting it under connection options was wrong. I can't understand why this new location is either better or worse than the old one. As far as I can tell, the order is alphabetical for the options that have single-character forms and essentially random after that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible
From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
On fre, 2010-12-24 at 08:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible place > > > > The order on the pg_dump/pg_dumpall man pages is not very strict, but > > surely putting it under connection options was wrong. > > I can't understand why this new location is either better or worse > than the old one. As far as I can tell, the order is alphabetical for > the options that have single-character forms and essentially random > after that. Except that there is a "The following command-line options control the database connection parameters." in between.
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible
From
Robert Haas
Date:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On fre, 2010-12-24 at 08:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> > Move the documentation of --no-security-label to a more sensible place >> > >> > The order on the pg_dump/pg_dumpall man pages is not very strict, but >> > surely putting it under connection options was wrong. >> >> I can't understand why this new location is either better or worse >> than the old one. As far as I can tell, the order is alphabetical for >> the options that have single-character forms and essentially random >> after that. > > Except that there is a "The following command-line options control the > database connection parameters." in between. Ah, OK. I missed that. Thanks. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company