Thread: TODO 9.0 done items removed
Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked items as "done" when they were done only in 9.1. I also updated the TODO legend at the top to mention 9.1: [D] Completed item - marks changes that are done, and will appear in thePostgreSQL 9.1 release. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of sáb jul 17 21:21:52 -0400 2010: > Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove > the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked > items as "done" when they were done only in 9.1. Should we create a TodoDone90 page like this one? http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone84
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of sáb jul 17 21:21:52 -0400 2010: > > Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove > > the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked > > items as "done" when they were done only in 9.1. > > Should we create a TodoDone90 page like this one? > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone84 Sure. How is that done? :-O -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. +
> Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of s<C3><A1>b jul 17 21:21:52 -0400 2010: > > > Since we branched 9.1 before we released Postgres 9.0, I had to remove > > > the 9.0 TODO items before 9.0 was released, or people might have marked > > > items as "done" when they were done only in 9.1. > > > > Should we create a TodoDone90 page like this one? > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone84 > > Sure. How is that done? :-O I figured it out; done: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I figured it out; done: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 Jeepers. That's a long list! David
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I figured it out; done: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 > Jeepers. That's a long list! Uh, there seems to be quite a lot there that is *not* done in 9.0. In fact, none of the first page's worth are done ... I stopped reading at that point. regards, tom lane
<br /><br /> On 08/09/2010 09:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:17940.1281404208@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><prewrap="">"David E. Wheeler" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:david@kineticode.com"><david@kineticode.com></a>writes: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">I figured it out; done: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90">http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90</a> </pre></blockquote></blockquote><pre wrap=""> </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Jeepers. That's a long list! </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> Uh, there seems to be quite a lot there that is *not* done in 9.0. In fact, none of the first page's worth are done ... I stopped reading at that point. </pre></blockquote><br /><br /> yeah. It seems complete nonsense to me too. For example, this item is BS AFAIK:<br /><blockquote><h3><spanclass="mw-headline"> PL/Perl </span></h3><span style="position: absolute; left: -4.5em; min-width:3.5em; text-align: right;"><a class="image" href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Image:UntickedTick.svg"title="Incomplete item"><img alt="Incomplete item"border="0" height="10" src="cid:part1.01010005.03050303@dunslane.net" width="10" /></a></span>Allow data to be passedin native language formats, rather than only text <br /></blockquote><br /> cheers<br /><br /> andrew<br /><br />
Tom Lane wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I figured it out; done: > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 > > > Jeepers. That's a long list! > > Uh, there seems to be quite a lot there that is *not* done in 9.0. > In fact, none of the first page's worth are done ... I stopped > reading at that point. Oh, I thought the wiki page was only a snapshot of the TODO list as of 9.0. I now see it is just completed items. I have updated the 9.0 TODO page accordingly: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 Now I see why the page is useful. :-) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 08/09/2010 09:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > "David E. Wheeler"<david@kineticode.com> writes: > >> On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> I figured it out; done: > >>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TodoDone90 > >> Jeepers. That's a long list! > > Uh, there seems to be quite a lot there that is *not* done in 9.0. > > In fact, none of the first page's worth are done ... I stopped > > reading at that point. > > > > > > > yeah. It seems complete nonsense to me too. For example, this item is BS > AFAIK: > > > PL/Perl > > Incomplete item > <http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Image:UntickedTick.svg>Allow data > to be passed in native language formats, rather than only text Thanks, removed. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
