Thread: getting to beta
Now that PostgreSQL 9.0 alpha4 is bundled (though apparently not quite out the door yet), it seems like a good time to think about what we'll need to do to get to beta. Any thoughts? http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently lists no open items, and the Hot Standby TODO page to which it links also lists no critical open items. The Streaming Replication TODO to which it links lists a LOT of open items. My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the above picture. ...Robert
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently > lists no open items, um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there, not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages. > My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the > above picture. I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer list... regards, tom lane PS: can we rename that page to "9.0 open items"?
Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently > > lists no open items, > > um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there, > not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages. > > > My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the > > above picture. > > I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff > that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer > list... I am. I am trying to close as many as I can, and sending emails about the rest. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.comPG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive,Christ can be your backup. +
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently >> lists no open items, > > um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there, > not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages. I'm sorry, I left a word out: I meant to say that it lists no *major* open items. There are certainly some things listed there, but nothing to get excited about, at least not AFAICS. >> My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the >> above picture. > > I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff > that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer > list... > > regards, tom lane > > PS: can we rename that page to "9.0 open items"? I leave that to someone with superior wiki-fu. ...Robert
Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items currently >>> lists no open items, >> um ... are we looking at the same page? I see 8 open items there, >> not counting the links to the separate HS and SR pages. > > I'm sorry, I left a word out: I meant to say that it lists no *major* > open items. There are certainly some things listed there, but nothing > to get excited about, at least not AFAICS. > >>> My suspicion is that the real situation is more complicated than the >>> above picture. >> I believe Bruce is in process of going through his mailbox to find stuff >> that slipped through the cracks. That will probably result in a longer >> list... >> >> regards, tom lane >> >> PS: can we rename that page to "9.0 open items"? > > I leave that to someone with superior wiki-fu. done Stefan