Thread: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Robert Haas
Date:
The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is
now closed.  Please submit all new patches at:

http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open

Reviewing assignments will be sent to pgsql-rrreviewers in the next
few hours.  I believe everyone who has volunteered to review is now a
member of that mailing list; if you want to review and don't get a
reviewing assignment by 04:00:00, please email me.  If there are any
stragglers out there who are still interesting in reviewing, it's not
too late to speak up.  There are still more patches than there are
reviewers, and obviously it would be much better if it were the other
way around.

I will be asking the reviewers to please complete their initial review
within 4 days, meaning by end of day on Saturday.  I am sure that not
everyone will be able hit that deadline, but it's good to have
something to aim for, and the more people hit it the better our
chances of getting a lot of good stuff done during this CommitFest.
Once the initial round of reviews is complete, I will reassign all
reviewers who still have bandwidth to new patches; I'm hoping that
we'll eventually be able to get a couple of people helping with each
of the big ones, but that won't be the case to start out, because I
think it's important to make sure that everyone gets at least some
feedback.

...Robert


Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Robert Haas
Date:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Tatsuo Ishii<ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php
>
> But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he
> do?  Just waits for next commitfest?

Adding a patch to the CommitFest doesn't require permission.  It's
just asking that the patch be reviewed, not guaranteeing anything.
Patch authors are supposed to add patches to the commitfest site
themselves, but I will add this one.

...Robert


Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
> > Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa:
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php
> >
> > But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he
> > do?  Just waits for next commitfest?
>
> Adding a patch to the CommitFest doesn't require permission.  It's
> just asking that the patch be reviewed, not guaranteeing anything.
> Patch authors are supposed to add patches to the commitfest site
> themselves, but I will add this one.

Thanks!
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan


Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Robert,

Tsutomu was asking to add his patches to July commit festa:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00782.php

But it does not seem all subsequent replies agree that. What shall he
do?  Just waits for next commit festa?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

> The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is
> now closed.  Please submit all new patches at:
> 
> http://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
> 
> Reviewing assignments will be sent to pgsql-rrreviewers in the next
> few hours.  I believe everyone who has volunteered to review is now a
> member of that mailing list; if you want to review and don't get a
> reviewing assignment by 04:00:00, please email me.  If there are any
> stragglers out there who are still interesting in reviewing, it's not
> too late to speak up.  There are still more patches than there are
> reviewers, and obviously it would be much better if it were the other
> way around.
> 
> I will be asking the reviewers to please complete their initial review
> within 4 days, meaning by end of day on Saturday.  I am sure that not
> everyone will be able hit that deadline, but it's good to have
> something to aim for, and the more people hit it the better our
> chances of getting a lot of good stuff done during this CommitFest.
> Once the initial round of reviews is complete, I will reassign all
> reviewers who still have bandwidth to new patches; I'm hoping that
> we'll eventually be able to get a couple of people helping with each
> of the big ones, but that won't be the case to start out, because I
> think it's important to make sure that everyone gets at least some
> feedback.
> 
> ...Robert
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:18:03 Robert Haas wrote:
> The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is
> now closed.

I don't know about others, but I find this terminology confusing.  The 
progression should be:

(Not accepting submissions) -> Accepting submissions -> In progress -> Closed


Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Kristian Larsson
Date:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:03:20AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:18:03 Robert Haas wrote:
> > The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest 2009-07 is
> > now closed.
> 
> I don't know about others, but I find this terminology confusing.  The 
> progression should be:
> 
> (Not accepting submissions) -> Accepting submissions -> In progress -> Closed

Indeed, just reading the subject of Roberts mail
had me confused for a while even though the body
quickly sorted that out.
  Kristian.

-- 
Kristian Larsson                                        KLL-RIPE
+46 704 910401                          kll@spritelink.net


Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed

From
Robert Haas
Date:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Kristian Larsson  
<kristian@spritelink.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:03:20AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 03:18:03 Robert Haas wrote:
>>> The time is now Wed Jul 15 00:18:00 UTC 2009 and CommitFest  
>>> 2009-07 is
>>> now closed.
>>
>> I don't know about others, but I find this terminology confusing.   
>> The
>> progression should be:
>>
>> (Not accepting submissions) -> Accepting submissions -> In progress  
>> -> Closed
>
> Indeed, just reading the subject of Roberts mail
> had me confused for a while even though the body
> quickly sorted that out.

Yeah, sorry about that. I meant "closed to new submissions", but I  
should've thought more carefully about the terminology.  I'll try to  
be more careful in the future.

...Robert