Thread: TODO items

TODO items

From
Jaime Casanova
Date:
Hi,

I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


Re: TODO items

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?

Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
those items to it?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


Re: TODO items

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
> 
> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
> those items to it?

For historical record I could see benefit.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> -- 
> Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org  Consulting, Development, Support, Training  503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
 



Re: TODO items

From
Andrew Dunstan
Date:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>   
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>>>       
>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>> those items to it?
>>     
>
> For historical record I could see benefit.
>
>   

Doesn't the wiki keep a page history? I don't see much point in keeping 
the old items in a current page.

cheers

andrew


Re: TODO items

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?

> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
> those items to it?

In the past we've figured that old TODO versions could be retrieved
from CVS history.  While that's still possible in the wiki environment,
it might be worth saving the old entries in a more easily accessible
fashion.
        regards, tom lane


Re: TODO items

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>   
>>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>>>>       
>>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>>> those items to it?
>>
>> For historical record I could see benefit.
>
> Doesn't the wiki keep a page history?

Yes, but it is not as convenient.


> I don't see much point in keeping  the old items in a current page.

It is useful to point out to people: look at all the things we did in 8.4!

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


Re: TODO items

From
Jaime Casanova
Date:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>
>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>> those items to it?
>
> In the past we've figured that old TODO versions could be retrieved
> from CVS history.  While that's still possible in the wiki environment,
> it might be worth saving the old entries in a more easily accessible
> fashion.
>

We want to use the same format/sections like in the TODO?


--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


Re: TODO items

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> We want to use the same format/sections like in the TODO?

Sure, why not?  Just copy the page and strip out the not-done items.
No reason to think hard here.
        regards, tom lane