Thread: Mention CITEXT in the FAQ
Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss case-insensitive comparisons. Best, David
Attachment
Bah, sorry for the duplication! David On Jan 8, 2009, at 11:00 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss > case-insensitive comparisons. > > Best, > > David
David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Quick patch to mention CITEXT in the parts of the FAQ that discuss > >> case-insensitive comparisons. > > > > I think it is too early to mention /contrib/citext in the FAQ because > > 8.4 is not released yet. > > Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is there not a branch > for 8.3 from which it's built? There are FAQ's in each branch, but the one that is put on the web site is from CVS HEAD. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is there not a branch >> for 8.3 from which it's built? > > There are FAQ's in each branch, but the one that is put on the web > site > is from CVS HEAD. Oh. That seems kind of odd…can you hang onto the patch until 8.4 is released, then? This must happen all the time, no? Best, David
David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Oh, is the FAQ on the site built from CVS tip? Is there not a branch > >> for 8.3 from which it's built? > > > > There are FAQ's in each branch, but the one that is put on the web > > site > > is from CVS HEAD. > > Oh. That seems kind of odd?can you hang onto the patch until 8.4 is > released, then? This must happen all the time, no? OK, I will hang on to it, but I will have to mention it is only in 8.4 too. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Oh. That seems kind of odd?can you hang onto the patch until 8.4 is >> released, then? This must happen all the time, no? > > OK, I will hang on to it, but I will have to mention it is only in 8.4 > too. Ah, yeah, I didn't put that in the patch… Thanks! David
On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:54 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Oh. That seems kind of odd?can you hang onto the patch until 8.4 is >>> released, then? This must happen all the time, no? >> >> OK, I will hang on to it, but I will have to mention it is only in >> 8.4 >> too. > > Ah, yeah, I didn't put that in the patch… Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is released. Is that supposed to be today? Thanks, David
Attachment
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is
> released. Is that supposed to be today?
The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself.
regards, tom lane
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is >> released. Is that supposed to be today? > > The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. It is? When did that happen? Best, David
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 09:15 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Just a reminder, Bruce, to add the CITEXT bit to the FAQ when 8.4 is > >> released. Is that supposed to be today? > > > > The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. > > It is? When did that happen? Quite some time ago. Joshua D. Drake > > Best, > > David > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> The FAQ is on the wiki now ... fix it yourself. > It is? When did that happen? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00111.php regards, tom lane
On Jul 1, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> It is? When did that happen? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00111.php Thanks. Change added to the wiki. Best, David