Thread: broken URL in commitfest page
In the current commitfest page we have this entry: pg_start_backup checkpoint issue However the URL it points to is broken (there's no message-id) What to do about it? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> In the current commitfest page we have this entry:
> pg_start_backup checkpoint issue
> However the URL it points to is broken (there's no message-id)
> What to do about it?
The "Join Removal" item fails to point to a patch, also.
regards, tom lane
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 14:16 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > In the current commitfest page we have this entry: > > pg_start_backup checkpoint issue > > However the URL it points to is broken (there's no message-id) > > What to do about it? Nothing yet. It's a minor issue, but not one I wanted to forget, but the patch doesn't currently exist as a separate patch. If we do anything, it needs to happen after we'd worked out what's happening with the big patches that touch xlog.c We really need some form of author-set priority scheme or way of recording dependencies between patches. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 12:26 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > In the current commitfest page we have this entry: > > pg_start_backup checkpoint issue > > However the URL it points to is broken (there's no message-id) > > What to do about it? > > The "Join Removal" item fails to point to a patch, also. I've removed that entry now. The patch was being worked on by Jonah but it looks like we didn't make the deadline. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> The "Join Removal" item fails to point to a patch, also. > > I've removed that entry now. The patch was being worked on by Jonah but > it looks like we didn't make the deadline. Well, what is the official deadline on it? It, like several other patches on the wiki, was a WIP. I'm hopeful that RI-based join elimination for JOIN_INNER should be ready tonight based on your and Tom's comments. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:23 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> The "Join Removal" item fails to point to a patch, also. > > > > I've removed that entry now. The patch was being worked on by Jonah but > > it looks like we didn't make the deadline. > > Well, what is the official deadline on it? It, like several other > patches on the wiki, was a WIP. I'm hopeful that RI-based join > elimination for JOIN_INNER should be ready tonight based on your and > Tom's comments. I think you should post what you have now as WIP. It will make it easier to discuss the questions you raise above. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:23 -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> The "Join Removal" item fails to point to a patch, also. >> > >> > I've removed that entry now. The patch was being worked on by Jonah but >> > it looks like we didn't make the deadline. >> >> Well, what is the official deadline on it? It, like several other >> patches on the wiki, was a WIP. I'm hopeful that RI-based join >> elimination for JOIN_INNER should be ready tonight based on your and >> Tom's comments. > > I think you should post what you have now as WIP. It will make it easier > to discuss the questions you raise above. Jonah - Do you have an updated patch for this? If it's too late for 8.4, maybe we can get something into 8.5? It would be nice to see what progress has been made, even if it is only WIP. Thanks, ...Robert