Thread: libpq events update
I would like to remove the PQpassThroughData and PQresultPassThroughData functions. The passThrough pointer should be added as a 3rd argument to the PGEventProc: typedef int (*PGEventProc)(PGEventId evtId, void *evtInfo, void *passThrough); Having a public accessor function for the passThrough. doesn't seem helpful. Its purpose is to be available to the eventproc, which doesn't require a public function. I think it got confused with the instanceData feature, which has nothing to do with the event system and requires public functions. libpqtypes happens to use the instanceData functions within its eventproc, but this is not a requirement. All those who oppose any of the above, speak now or forever hold your peace. An updated patch with full sgml documentation is coming. -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
Andrew Chernow wrote: > > I think it got confused with the instanceData feature, which has nothing > to do with the event system and requires public functions. libpqtypes > happens to use the instanceData functions within its eventproc, but this > is not a requirement. > I forgot to mention that the instanceData functions should be moved from libpq-events.h to libpq-fe.h because they are not part of the event system. I plan on making this change as well, so let me know if you hate it. -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> wrote: > Andrew Chernow wrote: >> >> I think it got confused with the instanceData feature, which has nothing >> to do with the event system and requires public functions. libpqtypes >> happens to use the instanceData functions within its eventproc, but this is >> not a requirement. >> > > I forgot to mention that the instanceData functions should be moved from > libpq-events.h to libpq-fe.h because they are not part of the event system. > I plan on making this change as well, so let me know if you hate it. An updated patch with docs and the above change is on -patches. Should we have sent that here? merlin