Thread: jaguar is failing
As you can see here: http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=jaguar&br=HEAD Jaguar has been failing for two days while centaur is ok. The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS Is that related? Thought you should know. Regards -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes: > As you can see here: > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=jaguar&br=HEAD > Jaguar has been failing for two days while centaur is ok. I asked you to look into that yesterday http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01216.php The copy of that mail that went directly to you bounced, with an error suggesting that your mail filtering setup has been broken for more than a year (you're depending on a blacklist server that ceased service in Dec 2006). If you want, I'll post the bounce I expect to get from this. > The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS > Is that related? Hmm, that might be the needed clue --- thanks for the reminder. regards, tom lane
I wrote:
> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
>> The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
>> Is that related?
> Hmm, that might be the needed clue --- thanks for the reminder.
Yup, that was it --- was able to duplicate the problem with
-DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. So I think jaguar's efforts already paid
for themselves ...
regards, tom lane
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:37:51 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: ohp@pyrenet.fr > Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is failing > > ohp@pyrenet.fr writes: > > As you can see here: > > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=jaguar&br=HEAD > > Jaguar has been failing for two days while centaur is ok. > > I asked you to look into that yesterday > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-03/msg01216.php I saw it thid moring in the digest > > The copy of that mail that went directly to you bounced, with an error > suggesting that your mail filtering setup has been broken for more > than a year (you're depending on a blacklist server that ceased > service in Dec 2006). If you want, I'll post the bounce I expect > to get from this. > Found the gulty and fired him :) > > The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS > > Is that related? > > Hmm, that might be the needed clue --- thanks for the reminder. > > regards, tom lane > -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:36:24 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] jaguar is failing > > I wrote: > > ohp@pyrenet.fr writes: > >> The only diff is that jaguar is compiling with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS > >> Is that related? > > > Hmm, that might be the needed clue --- thanks for the reminder. > > Yup, that was it --- was able to duplicate the problem with > -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. So I think jaguar's efforts already paid > for themselves ... > > regards, tom lane > Great! Did you commit a patch already, do you want me to rerun the build? -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> Did you commit a patch already, do you want me to rerun the build?
Yes; no --- looks like it'll run by itself in an hour anyay.
regards, tom lane
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > ohp@pyrenet.fr writes: > > Did you commit a patch already, do you want me to rerun the build? > > Yes; no --- looks like it'll run by itself in an hour anyay. I set up a new box with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS called pigeon so that we now have 2 boxes running this option. The build is scheduled once a day. For the record, it takes nearly 6 hours to run all the tests. -- Guillaume