Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the
From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Tom Lane wrote: > Hm, just noticed another little annoyance: CVS is going to complain about > the objfiles.txt files unless we add a .cvsignore entry to every last > subdirectory of the backend. Complain how? Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o files? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the
From
Tom Lane
Date:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, just noticed another little annoyance: CVS is going to complain about
>> the objfiles.txt files unless we add a .cvsignore entry to every last
>> subdirectory of the backend.
> Complain how?
Try a "cvs diff" or "cvs update" while these files are present.
> Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o
> files?
It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o.
regards, tom lane
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the
From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > > Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o > > files? > > It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o. Well, we could name the output file SUBSYS.o if that is not too confusing. :) -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the
From
Tom Lane
Date:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o
>>> files?
>>
>> It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o.
> Well, we could name the output file SUBSYS.o if that is not too confusing. :)
Yeah, it probably is. D'Arcy's suggestion of modifying our
CVSROOT/cvsignore file seems better.
regards, tom lane
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the
From
Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > >> Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: >> >>>> Why should it complain more or less than about the SUBSYS.o >>>> files? >>>> >>> It has a hard-wired rule not to complain about files named *.o. >>> > > >> Well, we could name the output file SUBSYS.o if that is not too confusing. :) >> > > Yeah, it probably is. D'Arcy's suggestion of modifying our > CVSROOT/cvsignore file seems better. > > +1. Calling it something like foo.o when it isn't an object file would be horrible. This should be a simple one-off operation. cheers andrew