Thread: Tidied up patch status page

Tidied up patch status page

From
Greg Smith
Date:
I'm not sure what order the patches at at 
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in 
before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by 
the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD



Re: Tidied up patch status page

From
Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Greg Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed
> in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted
> by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

well the original order was basically arbitrary(basically the order I
copied it over from my notes) - alvaro already resorted it once though ...
It's actually a pity that we are not running a more recent version of
mediawiki because newer versions do have things like sortable tables and
other improvments that might be of help.


Stefan


Re: Tidied up patch status page

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Greg Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at 
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in 
> before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by 
> the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

Yep, much better.  I think we didn't reorder it in the past to avoid
HTML churn but in the future I will try to keep that ordering.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


Re: Tidied up patch status page

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> I'm not sure what order the patches at at 
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in 
> before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by 
> the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did.

I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
"Maintaining cluster order on insert"
        regards, tom lane


Re: Tidied up patch status page

From
Greg Smith
Date:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz
> "Maintaining cluster order on insert"

It's back.  I double-checked:  40 patches before, 40 now.  I thought that 
I was safe editing this bugger at 5am, but Stefan was watching; I think I 
lost that one as part of the merge conflict confusion from the edit he did 
before I was finished proofreading.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD