Thread: Tidied up patch status page
I'm not sure what order the patches at at http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
Greg Smith wrote: > I'm not sure what order the patches at at > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed > in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted > by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. well the original order was basically arbitrary(basically the order I copied it over from my notes) - alvaro already resorted it once though ... It's actually a pity that we are not running a more recent version of mediawiki because newer versions do have things like sortable tables and other improvments that might be of help. Stefan
Greg Smith wrote: > I'm not sure what order the patches at at > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in > before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by > the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. Yep, much better. I think we didn't reorder it in the past to avoid HTML churn but in the future I will try to keep that ordering. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes: > I'm not sure what order the patches at at > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in > before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by > the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz "Maintaining cluster order on insert" regards, tom lane
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz > "Maintaining cluster order on insert" It's back. I double-checked: 40 patches before, 40 now. I thought that I was safe editing this bugger at 5am, but Stefan was watching; I think I lost that one as part of the merge conflict confusion from the edit he did before I was finished proofreading. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD