Thread: Mail getting through?

Mail getting through?

From
Gregory Stark
Date:
I sent two emails last night, one to -patches and one to -hackers. Neither
seems to have come through. Has anyone else seen them?

On -patches I posted an updated patch that was functionally a noop but changed
the macro api to SETVARSIZE(). It also replaced the VARATT_SIZE and
VARATT_DATA macros with VARSIZE and VARDATA, changed inet to call detoast, and
changed arrays, inet, geometric data types and a handful of others to use
SET_VARSIZE instead of accessing a struct member directly.

On -hackers I reposted Tom's email where he proposed two sets of bitpatterns
with tradeoffs and also included an additional one that was the second of his
with the 2-byte cases removed.

In it I said that removing the 2-byte cases had no advantages but actually
since then I've thought of one. It makes the toaster code simpler since it can
just set a bit in the four-byte header just as it does now. It doesn't have to
worry about converting to a 2-byte header.

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


Re: Mail getting through?

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Gregory Stark wrote:
> 
> I sent two emails last night, one to -patches and one to -hackers. Neither
> seems to have come through. Has anyone else seen them?

Not yet, but I got bounces from the server saying

451 - Server configuration problem

or something to that effect.  Since my emails were eventually delivered,
I'd expect yours to be too.


-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support