Thread: 8.2 open items list
I have update the 8.2 open items list: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems The Win32-bison-version-check thing is done, and we already renamed those xid columns. regards, tom lane
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 01:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems > > The Win32-bison-version-check thing is done, and we already renamed > those xid columns. What is the ISN problem? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > What is the ISN problem? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00245.php regards, tom lane
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > What is the ISN problem? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00245.php Ty. J > > regards, tom lane > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > What is the ISN problem? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00245.php I have added a URL column to the open items list. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 00:45 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems Is there a compelling reason to try to get the to_char() patch into 8.2? -Neil
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 00:45 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects into the pg_catalog schema: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg01049.php -Neil
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Is there a compelling reason to try to get the to_char() patch into 8.2?
This patch appears to be a reimplementation of code that was added in
8.2 --- before that we didn't try to localize month/day names at all.
If we think the code currently in HEAD is wrong, it would be better to
fix it now instead of having a behavior change in 8.2 and another one
in 8.3.
regards, tom lane
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects
> into the pg_catalog schema:
Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought
the conclusion was to leave it as-is.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: >> Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects >> into the pg_catalog schema: > > Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought > the conclusion was to leave it as-is. Yes, that was what i thought when I reviewed the thread last time this was re-raised: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00164.php I will also point out the pgAdmin 1.6 has now been released so incompatible changes in this area now *will* mean functionality regressions for users of 8.2 over users of 8.1 and 8.0, especially on Windows where adminpack has always been bundled. Regards, Dave
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > > Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects > > into the pg_catalog schema: > > Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought > the conclusion was to leave it as-is. Yes, that is my recollection too. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: >> > Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects >> > into the pg_catalog schema: >> >> Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought >> the conclusion was to leave it as-is. > > Yes, that is my recollection too. > At the very least there is no consensus to do anything else. cheers andrew
Bruce, Will have some kind of DTrace docs by tommorrow. Sorry, I was hoping that Robert would have a draft, and he was hoping that I would. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco