Thread: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Does this fix IPv6 on Win32?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> >> Context diff, please, diff -c.
>
> > It needed dos2unix and pgindent as well. Here's a cleaned patch.
> > Thanks to Chuck for doing this work.
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

From
"Andrew Dunstan"
Date:

I believe so, yes, although I think that we should remove the
HAVE_GETADDRINFO compile time test that Tom built into initdb.c the other
day, so that it can fall through to this code.

cheers

andrew

Bruce Momjian said:
>
> Does this fix IPv6 on Win32?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> >> Context diff, please, diff -c.
>>
>> > It needed dos2unix and pgindent as well. Here's a cleaned patch.
>> > Thanks to Chuck for doing this work.
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
>>




Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I believe so, yes, although I think that we should remove the
> HAVE_GETADDRINFO compile time test that Tom built into initdb.c the other
> day, so that it can fall through to this code.

Will do.  BTW, when we are using getaddrinfo.c, is the gai_strerror
routine therein sufficient for Windows?

            regards, tom lane