On Jul 27 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> > ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
> >
> > > In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens
> > > and correct it?
> > >
> > >I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
> > >have/want the patch installed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent
> > workaround for now would be to compile with optimisation turned off. Or
> > use another compiler - gcc is available isn't it?
>
> The SCO compiler was a buggy mess with any optimization turned on 10
> years ago, and it still is. I see no reason our community should waste
> time helping fix such a buggy compiler. If it was buggy for the past 10
> years, I think it will be buggy for the next 10 too. We should just
> turn off optimization for that compiler.
No we shouldn't. I'm actually working with the SCO compiler guys to get
this BUG fixed.
Let's not pre-judge.
>
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611
