Thread: Re: Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Reinhard Max <max@suse.de> wrote on 12.01.2005, 11:17:52: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 at 08:23, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > Not sure what is going on here: why is SUSE not listed on the supported > > platforms list? (still) > > > > ...is it because Reinhard seems resistant > > why do you think so? > > > (after private conversation) to the idea of submitting a formal port > > report via HACKERS, like everybody else? > > I andwered you that I will do it, but last week was a short week for > me, and this Monday I had an email from Peter Eisentraut telling me > that he will add the SUSE ports to the list, so I didn't see a need to > send a report in addition. Forgive my admittedly blunt tactics - I want to see SUSE on the list before we release, and time was short - that's all. If it wasn't for RC5, no port report would be listed in the docs in the final release.... It's better to have a SUSE contact support the port than for me to report it. I should note here also that SGI have replied "No" to my request for help (or access) with porting PostgreSQL onto the latest version of IRIX... Anyone got access to an HP/UX development system? Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Re: Re: Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
simon@2ndquadrant.com wrote: > I should note here also that SGI have replied "No" to my request for > help (or access) with porting PostgreSQL onto the latest version of > IRIX... Another year, some result... > Anyone got access to an HP/UX development system? Check out HP's testdrive program. Many of the port reports for 7.4 were done there, but I was too busy this time around to do that. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/