Thread: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent

From
Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Are we going to release 7.3.8? These seem critical...
--
Tatsuo Ishii

> Log Message:
> -----------
> Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent backpatch of left-join bug fix.
> (That's what I get for not testing the back branches *before* committing.)
> 
> Tags:
> ----
> REL7_3_STABLE
> 
> Modified Files:
> --------------
>     pgsql/src/backend/executor:
>         nodeHashjoin.c (r1.41.2.1 -> r1.41.2.2)
>
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c.diff?r1=1.41.2.1&r2=1.41.2.2)


> Subject: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Repair possible failure to update hint bits back to disk, per 
> From: tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
> To: pgsql-committers@postgresql.org
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:22:23 +0100 (BST)
> X-Mailer: activitymail 1.19, http://search.cpan.org/dist/activitymail/
> 
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Repair possible failure to update hint bits back to disk, per
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-10/msg00464.php.
> I plan a more permanent fix in HEAD, but for the back branches it seems
> best to just touch the places that actually have a problem.
> 
> Tags:
> ----
> REL7_3_STABLE
> 
> Modified Files:
> --------------
>     pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple:
>         pgstattuple.c (r1.9 -> r1.9.2.1)
>         (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstattuple.c.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.9.2.1)
>     pgsql/src/backend/access/heap:
>         heapam.c (r1.149 -> r1.149.2.1)
>
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c.diff?r1=1.149&r2=1.149.2.1)
>     pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt:
>         ri_triggers.c (r1.43.2.4 -> r1.43.2.5)
>
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c.diff?r1=1.43.2.4&r2=1.43.2.5)



Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> Are we going to release 7.3.8? These seem critical...

The hashjoin thing is not critical because it just fixes a breakage
I introduced since the last release.  The hint-bit business may be
worth a new release though.
        regards, tom lane