One issue is that we now have to update the PG_VERSION file in /data
(via configure.in) so we will be forcing an initdb when we make the
change.
Should we go ahead and make these changes now?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> The recent discussion on -hackers was leaning strongly to the idea that
> our upcoming release should be called 8.0 not 7.5, and after some
> small private argument the core committee agrees. We have a number of
> new features that warrant a major version bump (savepoints, PITR, native
> Windows port --- IMHO any one of those would do it). What may be even
> more to the point, we have enough internal changes in support of these
> things that we cannot honestly say to the world that this release will
> be more stable than the last one. Truth-in-advertising mandates that
> we call this an N.0 release, not an N.5 release. There are people out
> there who will avoid an N.0 release, and in all honesty we cannot tell
> them they shouldn't avoid this one.
>
> Accordingly, it's hereby decreed that PG-next will be PG 8.0.
> [ now, where did I put that puff of white smoke? ]
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
