Thread: Releasing 7.4.3 ...
Next Monday, we're going to put out a 7.4.3 release, incorporating all the little patches that have been back-patched to date ... I just setup a cron job that will build a nightly snapshot of 'stable', that is available on the ftp server under /pub/stable_snapshot ... If anyone has any patches they want to get into this, please submit them before Friday if you can ... Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ... specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right documentation? I will rebuild the tar ball nightly, and there are (will be) both .gz and .bz2 files available ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ...
README.CVS is not supposed to appear in the tarball --- whatever Bruce
thought he did to remove it is not working ...
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > > Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ... > > README.CVS is not supposed to appear in the tarball --- whatever Bruce > thought he did to remove it is not working ... Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it removed from the tarballs. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ... > specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right > documentation? Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the INSTALL file...
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as > far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it > removed from the tarballs. I've added a rule to remove README.CVS when making a distribution. But I seem to be missing any rules to build the plain-text documentation files. What happened to those?
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Removing README.CVS from the tarball is something Marc handles, as
>> far as I know. I just added it to CVS and never worked on having it
>> removed from the tarballs.
> I've added a rule to remove README.CVS when making a distribution. But
> I seem to be missing any rules to build the plain-text documentation
> files. What happened to those?
You mean HISTORY and INSTALL? They are there in the tarball (or were
yesterday anyway), so the build rule exists someplace ...
regards, tom lane
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ... >> specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the right >> documentation? > > Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the INSTALL > file... k, and that is supposed to tell me what? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Anyone else, please test the tar ball for any bug/nits ... > >> specifically, Peter, can you check that I've built/included the > >> right documentation? > > > > Try reading the list of supported platforms at the bottom of the > > INSTALL file... > > k, and that is supposed to tell me what? There is supposed to be a table there; I just see unaligned gargage. The INSTALL file looks quite bad.
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The INSTALL file looks quite bad.
It's clearly been freshly generated. The formatting does seem worse
than in previous versions, but it's not so bad I'd want to hold up
the release to fix it.
My guess is that the "wrong" version of lynx is being used to build it.
I remember being dissatisfied with the output of developer.pg.org's
version of lynx back when we were making this file manually.
(The version I have here is 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) and it seems to
do fine.)
regards, tom lane
I wrote:
> My guess is that the "wrong" version of lynx is being used to build it.
> I remember being dissatisfied with the output of developer.pg.org's
> version of lynx back when we were making this file manually.
> (The version I have here is 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) and it seems to
> do fine.)
Actually, having just tried it, 2.8.5rel.1 generates output that is
nearly indistinguishable from what's in this morning's snapshot.
In particular I do not get the ASCII-art decoration for the table of
supported platforms that I see in the 7.4.2 version of INSTALL.
It comes out exactly like what's in the snapshot.
I'm now wondering about changes in the SGML stylesheets used to generate
the .html file we then send to lynx. But I would definitely put this
in the category of "something to investigate and fix later".
regards, tom lane
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> The INSTALL file looks quite bad. > > It's clearly been freshly generated. The formatting does seem worse > than in previous versions, but it's not so bad I'd want to hold up > the release to fix it. > > My guess is that the "wrong" version of lynx is being used to build it. > I remember being dissatisfied with the output of developer.pg.org's > version of lynx back when we were making this file manually. > (The version I have here is 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) and it seems to > do fine.) svr1# lynx --version Lynx Version 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004) libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, OpenSSL 0.9.7d Built on freebsd4.9 Feb 28 2004 22:01:12 ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664