Thread: pgbench written in Pro*C
I received a copy of pgbench rewritten in Pro*C, which is similar to embedded C. I think it was done so the same program could be tested on Oracle and PostgreSQL. Are folks interested in this code? Should it be put on gborg or in our /contrib/pgbench? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I received a copy of pgbench rewritten in Pro*C, which is similar to > embedded C. I think it was done so the same program could be tested on > Oracle and PostgreSQL. > Are folks interested in this code? Should it be put on gborg or in our > /contrib/pgbench? If it requires non-free tools even to build, it is of no value. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I received a copy of pgbench rewritten in Pro*C, which is similar to > > embedded C. I think it was done so the same program could be tested on > > Oracle and PostgreSQL. > > > Are folks interested in this code? Should it be put on gborg or in our > > /contrib/pgbench? > > If it requires non-free tools even to build, it is of no value. OK, it's only value would be if we could modify it so it compiled using our ecpg and Pro*C and the comparison program could be run on both databases. I will tell the submitter to put it on gborg if they wish. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073