Thread: pg_restore -d doesn't display output
Does anyone know why 'pg_restore -d' doesn't display the commands being executed, like you see when you don't use '-d': pg_dump -Fc test >/tmp/test.dbpg_restore < /tmp/test.dbpg_restore -d test < /tmp/test.db The first pg_restore displays the commands, while the second does not. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Does anyone know why 'pg_restore -d' doesn't display the commands being > executed, like you see when you don't use '-d': > pg_restore < /tmp/test.db > pg_restore -d test < /tmp/test.db The first sends a script to stdout (effectively equivalent to pg_dump plain style). The second sends the commands to a backend. I would have expected there to be a --verbose option that would also echo the commands to stderr, but it doesn't look like there's any support for that in the code. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Does anyone know why 'pg_restore -d' doesn't display the commands being > > executed, like you see when you don't use '-d': > > > pg_restore < /tmp/test.db > > pg_restore -d test < /tmp/test.db > > The first sends a script to stdout (effectively equivalent to pg_dump > plain style). The second sends the commands to a backend. > > I would have expected there to be a --verbose option that would also echo > the commands to stderr, but it doesn't look like there's any support for > that in the code. I don't understand why sending something to a backend should effect the script output. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073