Thread: There are advantages to having an odd name
From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL". Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one else would want ... http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/18/0344251.shtml?tid=154 (I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh, the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are Firebird not FirebirdSQL.) regards, tom lane
Tom Lane kirjutas L, 19.04.2003 kell 05:53: > From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful > if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL". > Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one > else would want ... > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/18/0344251.shtml?tid=154 It's good to be reminded (in the light of the 'losing momentum' discussion focusing mainly on MySQL) that there are also 'real' databases (Interbase/firebird and SAP DB) that have possibility to catch up with us. One of the posts claimed Firebird (SQL) to be so good that if they could get 1/10th of the resources that postgresSQL has then postgreSQL wil be obliviated in 2 years ;-p > (I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh, > the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are > Firebird not FirebirdSQL.) I was also quite upset by it. I quite liked the proposal in another post proposing to name browsers like unix commands so Phoenix/Firebird could be just 'br' ;) ----------- Hannu
Hannu Krosing wrote: > Tom Lane kirjutas L, 19.04.2003 kell 05:53: > > From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful > > if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL". > > Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one > > else would want ... > > > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/18/0344251.shtml?tid=154 > > It's good to be reminded (in the light of the 'losing momentum' > discussion focusing mainly on MySQL) that there are also 'real' > databases (Interbase/firebird and SAP DB) that have possibility to catch > up with us. > > One of the posts claimed Firebird (SQL) to be so good that if they could > get 1/10th of the resources that postgresSQL has then postgreSQL wil be > obliviated in 2 years ;-p > > > (I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh, > > the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are > > Firebird not FirebirdSQL.) > > I was also quite upset by it. > > I quite liked the proposal in another post proposing to name browsers > like unix commands so Phoenix/Firebird could be just 'br' ;) I am wondering if they should switch to FirebirdSQL for clarity --- of course, it would be nice if Mozilla would change, but I don't see how you can call it FirebirdBrowser. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073