Thread: OS/400 support?
Hi everyone, We don't support OS/400 yet do we? :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes:
> We don't support OS/400 yet do we?
Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available for testing?
regards, tom lane
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:27 PM > To: Justin Clift > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OS/400 support? > > > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > > We don't support OS/400 yet do we? > > Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available > for testing? It's IBM. Not terribly Unix-y. This link may prove helpful: http://www-919.ibm.com/developer/factory/porting/faq_proc.html
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > > We don't support OS/400 yet do we? > > Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available for testing? I think Justin is refering to the AS/400 operating system. I have never heard of Postgres supporting this operating system. Gavin
Tom Lane wrote: > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > >>We don't support OS/400 yet do we? > > > Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available for testing? Oops, should have been clearer. OS/400 is the operating system on the IBM AS/400 series of midrange computers: Info: http://search400.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid3_gci331973,00.html IBM AS/400 page: http://www-132.ibm.com/content/home/store_IBMPublicUSA/en_US/eServer/iSeries/ Not sure if it's Unix-y or not. Just had the question come through the Advocacy site request form. Will see if anyone else has further info, and then ask the requestor for further details if not. :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift > regards, tom lane -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > OS/400 is the operating system on the IBM AS/400 series of midrange > computers: > > Info: > http://search400.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid3_gci331973,00.html > > IBM AS/400 page: > http://www-132.ibm.com/content/home/store_IBMPublicUSA/en_US/eServer/iSeries/ > > Not sure if it's Unix-y or not. Just had the question come through > the Advocacy site request form. Will see if anyone else has further > info, and then ask the requestor for further details if not. AFAIK it's not Unix-y *at* *all*. The best/only way to run PG on that hardware without an immense porting effort would be to run Linux alongside OS/400 in an LPAR (logical partition). -Doug
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > Info: > http://search400.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid3_gci331973,00.html That page quoth OS/400 and its related software has added support for: The Portable Application Solutions Environment (PASE), which supports a subset of the AIX environment so that Unixapplications can be ported and run on the AS/400 This suggests that our AIX port might work with little or no tweaking. Or perhaps not; "subset" could cover a multitude of sins. But it'd be worth trying. regards, tom lane
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > > Info: > > http://search400.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid3_gci331973,00.html > > That page quoth > > OS/400 and its related software has added support for: > > The Portable Application Solutions Environment (PASE), which > supports a subset of the AIX environment so that Unix applications can > be ported and run on the AS/400 > > This suggests that our AIX port might work with little or no tweaking. > Or perhaps not; "subset" could cover a multitude of sins. But it'd be > worth trying. That would be very wild if we could do that. Who volunteered? ;)
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) transmitted: > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: >> We don't support OS/400 yet do we? > > Never heard of it. Is it Unix-y? Do you have one available for testing? No, OS/400 is what replaced IBM System 34, System 36, and System 38. (Apparently they jumped to 40, and then multiplied by 10 to suggest it was 10x as good...) It was based on the CMU "Hydra" project, which built an OS with a pretty strong security kernel, with ties to the "orthogonal persistence" notion. By this point, they have created a POSIX-emulation environment so it can pretend to be somewhat like a Unix, but underneath, it's a database system for running RPG code. As such, it kind of starts as a DBMS. Somehow, I'm not sure that PostgreSQL-on-OS/400 is likely to be more than a curiosity. -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "enworbbc")) http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/rdbms.html If you can't see the bright side of things, polish the dark side...
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes: > > > Info: > > > http://search400.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid3_gci331973,00.html > > > > That page quoth > > > > OS/400 and its related software has added support for: > > > > The Portable Application Solutions Environment (PASE), which > > supports a subset of the AIX environment so that Unix applications can > > be ported and run on the AS/400 > > > > This suggests that our AIX port might work with little or no tweaking. > > Or perhaps not; "subset" could cover a multitude of sins. But it'd be > > worth trying. > > That would be very wild if we could do that. Who volunteered? ;) It might be pretty simple given PASE support and a hardware/OS manual. The problem is that first assumption: how many OS/400 users have PASE implemented? I'd say, not many. Gavin
Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes: > It might be pretty simple given PASE support and a hardware/OS manual. The > problem is that first assumption: how many OS/400 users have PASE > implemented? I'd say, not many. It says here: http://www-919.ibm.com/developer/factory/pase/v5r2.html that PASE is standard as of OS/400 V5R2. Anyone know how old that is? regards, tom lane
cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com writes:
> It was based on the CMU "Hydra" project,
Really!? Small world ... I was part of the Hydra team, more years ago
than I like to admit in public.
> Somehow, I'm not sure that PostgreSQL-on-OS/400 is likely to be more
> than a curiosity.
Probably. But a lot of our ports are just curiosities, at least to them
as aren't running that particular OS. My feeling is that Postgres on
top of PASE might be reasonable to support; I doubt we'd want to mess
with a native port.
regards, tom lane
Hi guys, Have passed on the info everyone provided about ways of getting PostgreSQL working on the OS/400 on to the requestor. It would be interesting to see if they go with it. Thanks for the assistance... more stuff will keep on coming through of course. :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift Tom Lane wrote: > cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com writes: > >>It was based on the CMU "Hydra" project, > > > Really!? Small world ... I was part of the Hydra team, more years ago > than I like to admit in public. > > >>Somehow, I'm not sure that PostgreSQL-on-OS/400 is likely to be more >>than a curiosity. > > > Probably. But a lot of our ports are just curiosities, at least to them > as aren't running that particular OS. My feeling is that Postgres on > top of PASE might be reasonable to support; I doubt we'd want to mess > with a native port. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi