Thread: New beta4 created ...

from looking at the sizes for the previous beta's, it *looks* right ...
someone want to take a quick peak?

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> from looking at the sizes for the previous beta's, it *looks* right ...
> someone want to take a quick peak?

The code seems right, and the postgres.tar.gz doc tarball seems right,
but the man.tar.gz doc tarball seems out of date --- in fact it looks
to be 7.2 documentation.  Was it supposed to be up to date, or are we
leaving that to fix later?
        regards, tom lane

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > from looking at the sizes for the previous beta's, it *looks* right ...
> > someone want to take a quick peak?
>
> The code seems right, and the postgres.tar.gz doc tarball seems right,
> but the man.tar.gz doc tarball seems out of date --- in fact it looks
> to be 7.2 documentation.  Was it supposed to be up to date, or are we
> leaving that to fix later?

We'll get this build right yet :)  I'm copying the man.tar.gz that is in:

cp /var/spool/ftp/pub/dev/doc/man.tar.gz ..

The postgres.tar.gz that is in there appears to be good to <1hr ago, but
you are right about the man.tar.gz ... Peter?

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> We'll get this build right yet :)  I'm copying the man.tar.gz that is in:
>
> cp /var/spool/ftp/pub/dev/doc/man.tar.gz ..
>
> The postgres.tar.gz that is in there appears to be good to <1hr ago, but
> you are right about the man.tar.gz ... Peter?

I've uploaded a new one.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net