Thread: beta3 packaged ...

beta3 packaged ...

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
announcing ...




Re: beta3 packaged ...

From
Tom Lane
Date:
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
> should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
> announcing ...

Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
dialup connection ...
        regards, tom lane


Re: beta3 packaged ...

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
> > should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
> > announcing ...
>
> Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
> dialup connection ...

'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...

Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?



Re: beta3 packaged ...

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
> > > should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
> > > announcing ...
> >
> > Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
> > dialup connection ...
> 
> 'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
> server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...
> 
> Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?

Yes.  If we din't need an initdb, we may have just skipped beta3 and
jumped right to RC1 next Friday.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


Re: beta3 packaged ...

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > > Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
> > > > should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
> > > > announcing ...
> > >
> > > Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
> > > dialup connection ...
> >
> > 'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
> > server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...
> >
> > Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?
>
> Yes.  If we din't need an initdb, we may have just skipped beta3 and
> jumped right to RC1 next Friday.

With the amount of chnages that went in between beta2 and no, there is no
way that an RC1 would go out without a beta3 :)