Thread: --with-maxbackends

--with-maxbackends

From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Didn't we want to remove that option?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



Re: --with-maxbackends

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Didn't we want to remove that option?

I didn't know it was still in there.  I see no reason for it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


Re: --with-maxbackends

From
"Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
On Saturday 07 September 2002 12:52 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Didn't we want to remove that option?
>
> I didn't know it was still in there.  I see no reason for it.

How about --enable-depend, that's not still needed is it?  Or is that
something other than the new dependancy system?



Re: --with-maxbackends

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> On Saturday 07 September 2002 12:52 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Didn't we want to remove that option?
> >
> > I didn't know it was still in there.  I see no reason for it.
> 
> How about --enable-depend, that's not still needed is it?  Or is that 
> something other than the new dependancy system?

That relates to C file dependencies, not pg_depend.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073