Thread: --with-maxbackends
Didn't we want to remove that option? -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Didn't we want to remove that option? I didn't know it was still in there. I see no reason for it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
On Saturday 07 September 2002 12:52 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Didn't we want to remove that option? > > I didn't know it was still in there. I see no reason for it. How about --enable-depend, that's not still needed is it? Or is that something other than the new dependancy system?
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > On Saturday 07 September 2002 12:52 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Didn't we want to remove that option? > > > > I didn't know it was still in there. I see no reason for it. > > How about --enable-depend, that's not still needed is it? Or is that > something other than the new dependancy system? That relates to C file dependencies, not pg_depend. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073