On Tue, 7 May 2002, Bertin, Philippe wrote:
Hi Phillippe,
> Thanks for your reply. I indeed already tried with a plpgsql function. But
> that's just my problem : if I call a function from within a view's rule,
> this function is not executed anymore with the same rights as a user had on
> the view. So if a user may access a view, but not the table behind, calling
> a function in the DO INSTEAD- clause will not execute the function with the
> proper (view) rights on the table ...
Oh, sure, you are right.
> (to all) Could anyone - (developers, eventually ?) explain me why the
> (security) context of a function call is not passed along when the function
> gets called from within a view ? I think this feature is for sure not
> superfluous, and I could consider having a look into the code to have this
> changed (but I think this is a VERY big pile of source codes I never ever
> looked at before, so this would take a lot of efforts ... for me)
That feature is added in current CVS I think. Maybe you can look at
current sources and backport the patch.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La verdad no siempre es bonita, pero el hambre de ella si"
