> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes@postgresql.org]
> Sent: 28 February 2002 07:04
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] eWeek Poll: Which database is most
> critical to your
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:39:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I cannot believe that caching results for
> literally-identical queries
> > is a win, except perhaps for the most specialized (read brain dead)
>
> I don't think they are brain dead. Well that is at first I
> thought so too, but then thinking some more it made sense.
> After all MySQL is used mostly for web pages and even your
> dynamic content doesn't change that often. But in between
> there are thousands of concurrent access that all execute the
> very same statement. This feature makes no sense IMO for the
> "normal" use we both probably had in mind when first reading,
> but for this web usage I see a benefit if it's implementable.
Everytime someone browses http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/ this is exactly
what's going on, as well as (I imagine) with Vince's interactive docs.
Regards, Dave.
